Talk:Nettelhorsterbrug

Requested move 1 March 2024

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. – robertsky (talk) 13:23, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

2024 Lochem bridge collapse → Nettelhorsterbrug – As many pointed out at the AfD, the current focus of the article is wrong. The text has already been improved. Kudos to all who worked on that!!! For a rename, Nettelhorst Bridge sounds better, however, not enough sources seem to support that name. So we probably should default to the long and complex Dutch name. If you beg to differ, I will not hold it against you! :-) gidonb (talk) 04:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Rename to Nettelhorsterbrug in keeping with AfD, name in keeping with WP:COMMONNAME, however would of course not be against English-variant Nettelhorst Bridge either. waddie96 ★ (talk) 22:01, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support Not enough established usage of Nettelhorst Bridge in my view, so per WP:USENATIVE support move to Nettelhorsterbrug. AusLondonder (talk) 14:52, 3 March 2024 (UTC)