User talk:AusLondonder

Sockorama
Yeah, I saw that. I'm looking into it right now, including a sockcheck. Bearcat (talk) 01:41, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Sockpuppet investigations/BeaverTails18, if you want to add a comment or anything. Bearcat (talk) 02:01, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Warning - Content removal
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Islamic Relief, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you..--Bali Makmur (talk) 21:35, 15 May 2016 (UTC)


 * As someone who just dropped into this talk page and was a little surprised to see the above claim, it doesn't take a lot to see that the accusation of disruptive editing by AusLondonder is nonsense. --Super Nintendo Chalmers (talk) 22:25, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Indeed this editor seems to have a bit of a record of poor behaviour. They have edit-warred, used misleading edit summaries, removed sourced content and failed to follow WP:NPOV repeatedly. This template (from an editor with 108 edits) is about my removal of a "terrorist" category from an article about a British Islamic charity. AusLondonder (talk) 22:37, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Anyway, as you've seen I decided to take the category to CFD because of the major potential for misuse AusLondonder (talk) 22:40, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

List_of_websites_blocked_in_the_United_States
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:List_of_websites_blocked_in_the_United_States Ironcurtain2 (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leonie Cooper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Socialist society. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Corbyn pic
I note you have not voted yourself in the corbyn beauty pageant, if you were going to vote ... the amusing thing is i sure Corbyn himself would not mind which picture it was :) --  BOD --  22:25, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm sure he'd be horrified by the very concept, to be quite honest! I think the current pic is certainly not the best. But I'm not convinced entirely on what picture is the best replacement. I'll probably make my mind up in the next couple of days :) AusLondonder (talk) 04:17, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Ports of Nepal?
Please see my comments on your proposal re Category:Ports of Nepal Hugo999 (talk) 23:27, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing that out, I have replied at CFDS. AusLondonder (talk) 01:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride 2016
As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?
 * Create or improve LGBT-related Wikipedia pages and showcase the results of your work here
 * Document local LGBT culture and history by taking pictures at pride events and uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons
 * Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.

This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:46, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nikolaos Nikolopoulos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Achaia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:33, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
 * Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited London Legacy Development Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Biggs. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Murder of Jo Cox
Hey :)

I'd just like to point out a few things regarding the draft you just created:
 * Under British English (which should apply given it's a British event), an assassination has to have a political motive. Since a motive is not yet known, this cannot be an assassination. (I note that you have since renamed the article from me starting to write this, but the infobox still says asssassination).
 * It's not a murder until it's proven as such in a court of law - there's some discussion on Talk:Jo Cox about this. In the UK, Sub Judice applies now since an arrest has been made, which has potential implications for those reporting on the event in the UK, which we both are.
 * You've named the alleged perpetrator of an unproven crime - I'd like to point you int the direction of WP:BLPCRIME

I'm not disagreeing with splitting it into a new article, just please be careful with this!

 &#91; stwalkerster &#124; talk &#93;  03:04, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Murder of Jo Cox for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Jo Cox is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Murder of Jo Cox until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  06:58, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Where?
Where is this other nomination? Surely it would be at the current AfD's page title? StillWaitingForConnection (talk) 18:09, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * It is referenced on the talkpage. It was however at the earlier title of the page. See Articles for deletion/Murder of Jo Cox AusLondonder (talk) 18:12, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Well
You and AGF don't get along very well, I think. "Pointy, sly and contentious"? Drmies (talk) 11:51, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
 * you and BRD don't get on very well. AusLondonder (talk) 12:33, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Depends. A revert whose edit summary contains only insults, that's not likely to make anyone discuss anything. BRD is an essay, as you know; AGF is a fundamental principle in this joint. Drmies (talk) 20:39, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
 * You waited until less eyes were on the article to remove a massive section which you know had community support. You arbitrarily chose some nations as "involved" - not French neighbours such as the Netherlands or the United Kingdom. You left the United States in unsurprisingly. The revert summary was describing your behaviour not you as a person or you as an editor. I have disputed your arbitrary and pointy removal now should be the time to discuss. AusLondonder (talk) 01:54, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Flags on Death of Jo Cox
Please see this discussion   Mlpearc  ( open channel ) 15:39, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Why bother starting a discussion if midway through with no consensus for your position, you show huge disrespect for your fellow editors by making the disputed change with a totally misunderstood rationale? AusLondonder (talk) 04:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Please check the times.  Mlpearc  ( open channel ) 04:28, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Apologies, although I think the status quo should have remained before starting the discussion per WP:BRD AusLondonder (talk) 04:36, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Same-sex marriage in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unitarians. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

There's an AfD about a topic related to you
Articles for deletion/Hallel Yaffa Ariel--Bolter21 (talk to me) 18:53, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

AFD
Little late in writing this but wanted to say that I hope there aren't any hard feelings about Articles_for_deletion/Reactions_to_the_2016_Orlando_nightclub_shooting. Hope you know that it has nothing to do with animus toward the LGBTQ community or anything. I just feel that many of the news-related articles are TOOSOON but it's becoming clear I'm in the minority with that opinion (e.g., Talk:2016_shooting_of_Baton_Rouge_police_officers). I'm recalibrating my perceptions of the community norm based on the feedback in the AFD.

TL;DR - sorry if I put you through any undue stress, especially related to such a traumatic event to folks in the LGBTQ community.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 03:06, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that! Really cool of you, I appreciate it. I had taken a little break from the project for a couple of weeks which I think we all need sometimes! No hard feelings at all :) AusLondonder (talk) 22:27, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Glad to hear and thank you. Hope your wikibreak went well! Glad to have you back!  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 02:47, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Electoral division of Blain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Terry Mills (politician). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Category:Clive Palmer has been nominated for discussion
Category:Clive Palmer, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 01:30, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Seats with most members
Hey, just explaining my undoing your change to Division of Bass - it's actually only had sixteen different members (equal with Bendigo, Denison and Swan), but Warwick Smith was the member twice. :) Frickeg (talk) 08:44, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * No worries thanks for fixing it up :) AusLondonder (talk) 19:50, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge and WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Rename Legal history of cannabis in Canada to Cannabis in Canada?
Your comments solicited here: Talk:Legal_history_of_cannabis_in_Canada. Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 08:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of United Kingdom general election, 2015 (London) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United Kingdom general election, 2015 (London) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/United Kingdom general election, 2015 (London) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheMagikCow (talk) 17:52, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Bret Chiafalo
Couldn't you just put in a regular deletion request? MB298 (talk) 06:25, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi I am willing to do that if you take exception. Just remove the tag if you disagree. AusLondonder (talk) 06:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅. MB298 (talk) 06:33, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Avocado Declaration
Another user already declined your PROD, so now you have to take it to AfD if you think it should be deleted. Me-123567-Me (talk) 01:20, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * BTW I invite you to join a new Wikiproject over at WP:Greens. Me-123567-Me (talk) 01:21, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

My apologies, it was a speedy tag. But if a speedy was declined, it is likely a PROD will be too. I suggest not wasting your time and going right to AfD if you feel strongly about it. Me-123567-Me (talk) 01:24, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Lavender Greens for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lavender Greens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lavender Greens until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Me-123567-Me (talk) 18:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

A few examples
Of recurring events in location establishment categories
 * New York City Marathon in 1970 establishments in New York
 * Grand National in 1839 establishments in the United Kingdom
 * Reading Amateur Regatta in 1842 establishments in England
 * Mar del Plata chess tournament in 1928 establishments in Argentina
 * Scripps National Spelling Bee in 1925 establishments in the United States

And thousands more. You want to change what articles such as these are categorized, I suggest WP:RFC or the talk page for WP:Categorization....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:16, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Are you suggesting it should be categorised as an "establishment in Rhode Island" even though it could be held in any state in future years? AusLondonder (talk) 17:25, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes because that is where it started. Events as well as companies can move, but all started somewhere. There are cases where they move and even come back to its roots before ending. For instance, Western Open, a 1899 establishment and 2006 disestablishment in Illinois. In between the event was played in 15 other United States....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:42, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Lavender Hill High School
Hi, I'm TonyBallioni. AusLondonder, thanks for creating Lavender Hill High School!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. If you could add references to [WP:V

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

TonyBallioni (talk) 16:14, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lavender Hill High School


The article Lavender Hill High School has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable school without any sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 16:00, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Lavender Hill High School for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lavender Hill High School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lavender Hill High School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TM 16:04, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

SMILE!
 Hello AusLondonder, Me-123567-Me has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! Me-123567-Me (talk) 18:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC) Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

CSD - Mexico radio stub cats
I wasn't aware of that particular CSD criterion. I want to populate those Mexico regional radio station stub cats but am not familiar with stub sorting and would need to create 32 templates and edit more than 1,200 articles. Would it be possible for you to help me with that? Raymie (t • c) 08:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * As soon as you add a single article to the CSD criteria no longer applies. I would probably be able to help if you let me know what needs to be done. I'm not an expert in stub sorting either though :) AusLondonder (talk) 09:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Recent edit to Steve Christian
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Steve Christian, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Dan Koehl (talk) 07:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Hello, I'm Me-123567-Me. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/California Green Party Archives that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Me-123567-Me (talk) 17:28, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I didn't remove the comment, but it's still not nice. Me-123567-Me (talk) 17:29, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Personal attack
"A bit of a patronizing arse" may be relatively mild compared to some other things I heard recently, but it is still a personal attack. Kindly refrain. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 03:31, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Invitation for comment
As someone who deals with current event articles, I am soliciting comments from you on my first attempt at a Wikipedia essay: WP:DJTG/WP:HOLDYOURHORSES. I've started a section on the talk page of the essay for comments (or you can just edit the article). Having worked on current event articles and terrorism lists, I thought this essay might be useful when addressing editors who add content prematurely (e.g., labeling an even as Islamist terrorism before RS proclaim it to be so). If you have the time and energy, feel free to comment or edit on it. Cheers!  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 04:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Tagging for speedy deletion
Thanks for reminding that a copy of the same tag need to be posted at the talk page of the page creator. I have been placing tags on the page alone so far. Bilingual2000 (talk) 06:58, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem thanks for your friendly response :) AusLondonder (talk) 07:00, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kroonstad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pick'n'Pay. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Belated April Fool's, maybe?
So... blocks AusLondoner for twelve hours with the rationale ... Fifteen hours after their last edit?! Presumably the edits of concern are those most recent, labelled "per WP:TIES"- but none of those, that I can see, have been reverted, which begs the question as to how disruptive they were. In any case; where's the discussion, the escalated series of warnings, even? &mdash; O Fortuna!   Imperatrix mundi.  09:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Is this a joke? What on earth is this about? You haven't even notified me of the block let alone discussed the issue with me?!? AusLondonder (talk) 11:08, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Just checked has not even reverted a single of my edits? Wtf? AusLondonder (talk) 11:10, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * No complaint about my conduct, no discussion raised that I'm aware of on any forum, no block template, no notification of the right of appeal? I'm seriously wondering whether 's account has been compromised. AusLondonder (talk) 11:13, 4 April 2017 (UTC)


 * I was just coming to the same conclusion as Brown HairedGirl. Bizarre block, good unblock. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:34, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot for that. Definitely was weird seeing this today. AusLondonder (talk) 12:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * You're welcome, @AusLondonder. I'm just sorry you had to go through this, and that I didn't spot it sooner. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:45, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * (ec)Thanks, Boing. I am going to raise this at ANI, where I hope that  will be able to give a good explanation of what happened here. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:44, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Perhaps ask him at his talk page first? There might be a good response that would avoid the need for ANI. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:56, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry -- too late, Boing. I had posted at ANI before seeing your comment. In any case, I think that something as bizarre as this deserves a more public discussion, particularly given the possibility of account compromise (as speculated above by AusLondonder). Hopefully will have a good response which keep the ANI thread short. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:11, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yep, fair enough. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:16, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * (ec) +1 to my colleagues above. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:45, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Belated apology
I want to acknowledge my judgemental error here and to apologize for the block which I precipitously and improperly placed following on that judgemental error. This is discussed in some detail at WP:ANI, and I don't want to rehash that discussion here. I do want to to apologize here, though, both for my bad judgement in this instance and for the block which I improperly placed as a result of that bad judgement. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:39, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your apology. It is most appreciated. AusLondonder (talk) 17:35, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

ANI discussion relating to you
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Wtmitchell's block of AusLondonder. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:04, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Can anyone help me write the article with finished contracts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by NIS Construction (talk • contribs) 16:21, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Is it possible to help me write an article on the corporation. I am the marketer and I have never written an article on wikipedia.

NIS Construction (talk) 16:28, 4 April 2017 (UTC) 

Wrong guideline in editsummary?
Hi AusLondonder

I was just checking your contribs from yesterday to see if I could find any trace of what might have prompted the block.

No sign of that, which makes the block look even more bizarre, but I did spot one small unimportant thing. Several of your edits which rightly corrected the spelling of International Labour Organization used an edit summary which included a link to WP:BRINT, which is a redirect to WP:Redirect. That clearly isn't what you meant, so I presume it was just a mistaken recollection of another shortcut.

Obviously, that small glitch in no way justifies any reproach, let alone an out-of-the-blue block ... but I just thought I'd point it out for future reference, in case someone gets antsy about it.

Hope this helps! If not, pls ignore.

Best wishes, -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:06, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi . Thanks for that and for your help the past few days. It has been most appreciated. Sorry for my delay in replying I've been super-busy off-wiki. You're right I wasn't using the most correct shortcut. I was meaning the part just below where WP:BRINT appears which says "Spelling errors and other mistakes should be corrected. Don't link to a misspelled redirect". When correcting spelling in similar circumstances in future do you have any advice on what I should say in the edit summary?
 * Thanks again for your help :) AusLondonder (talk) 15:37, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Edit the guideline and stick a specific anchor in it? Andy Dingley (talk) 15:46, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * @Andy Dingley: I don't think any guideline needed to be cited. It was just a matter of fixing the spelling of a proper name. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:57, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * (ec)Hi AusLondonder
 * I was glad to be able to help. I saw your username pop up somewhere else, but with a strikeout line through it (I have a CSS setting which does that to blocked usernames), and went to investigate ... and just thought I'd not like that to be me!
 * I dunno if you have seen my reply to Wtmitchell's response at ANI: WP:ANI. What I suggested there (in point #1) was that since you were correcting the spelling of a proper name, a  better edit summary might have been as something like "correct spelling of proper name International Labour Organization".
 * But I'm sure there are other ways of doing it. Just check shortcuts afore using them!  (I know, we all screw up on that one sometimes, and it's no biggie, unless you encounter an admin on a hair-trigger over a flakey internet connection).
 * Best wishes, -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:49, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thankfully we have some competent admins around here! I thought what could I possibly have done to irritate this guy! I've seen your reply it certainly put in words exactly what I was thinking. Thanks for the tip about the edit summary it seems like a good idea to avoid any potential confusion. Who would have thought the spelling of the International Labour Organization would be cause for such excitement! AusLondonder (talk) 16:45, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Glad that helped. And the ANI thread has been closed without any further action, which I think is a good outcome. Wtmitchell has (belatedly) apologised to you, and can be in no doubt that they screwed up badly and had better not screw up like that again.  Hope you feel reassured that it hasn't left any stain on your record. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:18, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm glad it is now all resolved. Hopefully they won't repeat their mistake in future. I want to thank you again for your assistance and wisdom through all of this. AusLondonder (talk) 17:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Enrique Guerrero Salom


The article Enrique Guerrero Salom has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 20:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * AusLondonder (talk) 20:48, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Discussion invite
Hello. I invite you to join a centralized discussion about naming issues related to China and Taiwan. Szqecs (talk) 10:33, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

2017 Stockholm attack
In a recent edit to the page 2017 Stockholm attack, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to India, use Indian English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 19:48, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

I think you made a big mistake on this. The article is written in British English. So the people have to use the British words. Look at the discussion page.--Rævhuld (talk) 19:53, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I have replied at the talkpage. Your edits violate MOS:RETAIN and MOS:TIES. The first substantial versions of the page use truck not lorry. AusLondonder (talk) 19:54, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Ulrike Rodust
Title doesn't match text Jutta Steinruck vs. Ulrike Rodust, --Mandavi (talk) 18:11, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks that was a mistake from copying a template, I have now fixed it. AusLondonder (talk) 18:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Aniar, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. also disruptive editing on Locks Brasserie and The Greenhouse (restaurant) plus POV-pushing. The Banner talk 22:19, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * This guideline is a part of the English Wikipedia's Manual of Style. It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply. Any substantive edit to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on the talk page. What part of treated with common sense do you not understand? The Banner talk 22:25, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Please advise what "occasional exception" applies here. Don't bother with the crap about what you learnt at school again because that has no bearing on WP:TIES. Please try and stop POV-pushing for once. AusLondonder (talk) 22:45, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Okay, you indeed do not understand treated with common sense. Clear, thank you. The Banner talk 23:02, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Seriously? You're pushing British English onto an article, where you can't even give the title of that article without using Gaelic or at least some level of Irish English? As the local dialect would advise, catch yerself on. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:08, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Reverting
Please stop reverting, as per the discussion on the 420 project I'm restoring them all, Thank you. – Davey 2010 Talk 01:41, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Al-Zebabist Nation of Ooog
I declined G4 on this based on a review of the deleted version, I feel that the sourcing provided appears substantially different. This is of course without prejudice to other deletion mechanisms, such as AfD. Note that I had previously been asked about this earlier in the day, see my talk page. Best regards, --joe deckertalk 05:44, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Have you ever heard of don't template the regulars?
If you haven't it's at Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars. There was no disruptive editing on my part. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:14, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, I have. Which is why rather than placing a template warning I wrote you a personalised note regarding your disruptive editing. AusLondonder (talk) 06:06, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I stand corrected. I am a member of the project where that template was placed and there's no consensus of the English language project to promote your project's cause so yeah, I have the right to remove it. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:08, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * You have no such right. Please take a look at WP:TPO which states " The basic rule....is that you should not edit or delete the comments of other editors without their permission". AusLondonder (talk) 06:10, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Abby Tomlinson


The article Abby Tomlinson has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inops (talk) 22:45, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Trump
Just FYI, another editor (not me) removed the word "false". I put it back in per longstanding consensus, but then it occurred to me that it's not proper to revert merely because of no consensus. So it's best if someone else (like you) puts that word back, given that I think it's overkill. Anyway, you wrote "???" in your edit summary, so I came here to explain. Cheers.&#32;Anythingyouwant (talk) 05:03, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Ah ok no worries. AusLondonder (talk) 12:26, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Just for pride purposes
I hand typed WCPW Pro Wrestling World Cup 2017 out. I understand and begrudgingly agree with it's deletion, but I did not copy and paste anything minus the bracket templates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hiitit (talk • contribs) 00:54, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello there. I'm sorry your article got deleted, even if it was something I supported. From experience I know it can be seriously disheartening and irritating, especially when you put in work on it. I did self-revert the speedy template because I realised that wasn't appropriate in the circumstances. AusLondonder (talk) 12:28, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

2017 Stockholm attack (2)
Hello. I have removed the dog again since there was NO consensus for adding it in the discussions on the talk page. The only one who wanted to add it was you, while multiple editors opposed it. - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 09:53, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * False. Feel free to re-read Talk:2017 Stockholm attack/Archive 1 and then get back to me. AusLondonder (talk) 09:55, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree with AusLondonder, as I already stated in the archived thread. (Why is the archiving so quick?) But adding the dog to the infobox, or adding the dog's name (for god's sake) is just grotesque. Bishonen &#124; talk 10:03, 24 April 2017 (UTC).
 * I have of course read the discussion in the archive, a discussion I took part in, and see no consensus for adding it (people who say they won't oppose it count as neutral in my book, and when looking at the rest I find more who oppose it than who support it...). - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 10:10, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Well when you mis-count consensus in a way that suits yourself it is no surprise you produce a result that suits yourself. AusLondonder (talk) 10:14, 24 April 2017 (UTC)


 * RfC started about whether the dog should be mentioned among casualties/fatalities or not, since the outcome of the previous discussion obviously is "open to interpretations". - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 10:31, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Srinagar (Lok Sabha constituency) by-election, 2017


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Srinagar (Lok Sabha constituency) by-election, 2017, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
 * It covers a topic on which we already have an article - Srinagar bypoll election protests 2017. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Srinagar bypoll election protests 2017, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:23, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Kiev vs. Kyiv
If you feel strongly about the matter, then take it to the Talk:Kiev/naming page, because that's where it's going to be decided -- not at the "Kyi, Shchek and Khoryv" article. AnonMoos (talk) 07:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm fully aware of that. The consensus is that we use Kiev not Kyiv, which is what I have done at Kyi, Shchek and Khoryv. AusLondonder (talk) 08:15, 22 May 2017 (UTC)


 * I was very sure that I had already eliminated all "Kyiv" spellings in previous edits to the article (see summaries of past edits), so I guess I got confused, sorry... AnonMoos (talk) 21:26, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * No worries :) AusLondonder (talk) 09:00, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Dear AusLondonder, The name Kiev is incorrect. The correct name is Kyiv, Kiev - is a Russian version of Kyiv, and it already has been proved as incorrect. For the more details, please, check the link with grammar background on this issue by Radio Svoboda: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hk8SiM75_eE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annapetrenko (talk • contribs) 20:38, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

2017 Manchester Arena Bombing
You re-added 2017 Manchester Arena bombing to Template:Islamic terrorism in Europe (2014–present) and you added the template to the article without edit summaries. The attack has not been determined to be Islamic terrorism in any reliable sources that I'm aware of. Please join the talk page discussion to justify adding this template. Thank you.- MrX 11:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Category
Can you please remove it? Your rationale is obsolete.Zigzig20s (talk) 17:53, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride 2017
You are invited to create and improve LGBT-related content at Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects throughout the month of June as part of the fourth annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign. Feel free to add new and expanded content on the project's Results page. Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:59, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Aaron Bastani for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aaron Bastani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aaron Bastani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Arms &amp; Hearts (talk) 17:45, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Category:History of Cleveland County, Arkansas
Hello AusLondonder. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Category:History of Cleveland County, Arkansas, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The category is not empty at this point. Thank you. ~ GB fan 10:54, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Category:History of Tishomingo County, Mississippi
Hello AusLondonder. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Category:History of Tishomingo County, Mississippi, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The category is not empty at this point. Thank you. ~ GB fan 10:54, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Re: June 2017
"Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Grenfell Tower fire, you may be blocked from editing. AusLondonder (talk) 03:16, 14 June 2017 (UTC)"

What does this mean; I am not being "disruptive." Was this message intended for someone else? Am I supposed to register before I edit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:7FC0:7B:410:4122:4335:F6DD (talk) 03:19, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Revize
I think you/we meant B in Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_June_16. Oculi (talk) 17:06, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Finsbury Park attack
There's a claim that you may have supported this because you believed that ten people were killed. Can you confirm or deny that? Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:50, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Aaron Bastani for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aaron Bastani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aaron Bastani& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:29, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Question...
Did you try to comply with WP:BEFORE, prior to nominating the article on Anne Marie Waters for deletion?

Your nomination said she was merely a failed candidate. Yet, when I google searched her I found half a dozen topics where coverage of her was not about her "failed candidacy". Geo Swan (talk) 18:15, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aaron Bastani


A tag has been placed on Aaron Bastani, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion,. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Light2021 (talk) 20:38, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Edits to Lee Rhiannon
Your recent edit to the page Lee Rhiannon doesn't make it clear that the issue was more than just education funding. Would you mind if I made an edit to that effect. Gumsaint (talk) 03:58, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Categories for speedy deletion
Agree with deletion of categories "195 by country" and "196 by country" but not categories "195 by continent" and "196 by continent" Hugo999 (talk) 23:36, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

SMILE!! 9 July 2017
 Hello AusLondonder, Me-123567-Me has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! Me-123567-Me (talk) 16:27, 9 July 2017 (UTC) Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Use British English template
Here you removed Use British English from Angers. While WP:TIES talks about which dialect should be used for new articles, my understanding of Use British English, based on its documentation, is that it's descriptive, not prescriptive. The article happens to be currently written in British English, and WP prefers that subsequent edits maintain consistency unless there is good reason to convert to another dialect (in this case, there isn't). The purpose of the template is to guide subsequent authors, and, at least in theory, the ENGVAR tool; this is an independent concept from WP:TIES. Did I miss something? David Brooks (talk) 02:14, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The Angers article currently uses a combination of American and British spelling, though. For example it uses "center" and -ize spelling. AusLondonder (talk) 09:57, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
 * True. Thanks for pointing it out. David Brooks (talk) 11:59, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Jamie Waylett
Hi Aus. You recently added a cat to Jamie Waylett: Prisoners and detainees of England and Wales. I've no idea what he's up to, but I assume he's out and about now. Unless that cat is slightly misnamed, it doesn't apply to him. Could you remove it? Cheers, Bromley86 (talk) 10:25, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Pholisa Makeleni
Hi, I'm Boleyn. AusLondonder, thanks for creating Pholisa Makeleni!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as needing more references and as a stub.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 13:01, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Murder of Jo Cox
Please take this to the talk page, I've opened a discussion there. This is Paul (talk) 16:40, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding whether the murder of Jo Cox can be classed as a terrorist incident. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Murder of Jo Cox".The discussion is about the topic Murder of Jo Cox. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! --This is Paul (talk) 17:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Noenieput) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Noenieput, AusLondonder!

Wikipedia editor Anoptimistix just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Hello thanks for contibutions, this article about village passes WP:V, as South African police's website confirms it, however other contents like towns location and province could not be verified as the source does not provides information about them. If you add more source than feel free to remove the tag. Once again thanks for your contributions"

To reply, leave a comment on Anoptimistix's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Anoptimistix (talk) 12:39, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Francis Zammit Dimech) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Francis Zammit Dimech, AusLondonder!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Since there's a picture on Commons (not a great one to be fair) I've added it. A bot had added foreign-language links so I purged the page to activate them. Hope that's all OK."

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Blythwood (talk) 17:30, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

I have nominated you for Auto patrolled Rights
I have nominated you for Autopatrolled rights at WP:PERM/A, an administrator have asked you whether you commit to fill bare URLs which are cited as reference. Well I think you should say yes as filling bareurls is very easy, all you have to do is go at https://tools.wmflabs.org/refill/ and enter page name, this will automatically fillup bare URL's Anoptimistix (talk) 00:17, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the nomination! I agreed to not use bare URLs in future. Thanks again! AusLondonder (talk) 10:38, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

It was my pleasure nominating a great content creator like you. Anoptimistix (talk) 11:31, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted
Hi AusLondonder, I just wanted to let you know that I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&page=User%3AAusLondonder added] the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing!  Schwede 66  19:14, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

UK involvement in European XFEL
You made this edit to the European X-ray free-electron laser article and reverted a change to the map, but the source already cited does not appear to back up the way the article now reads. I had raised this on the article's talk page a few days ago. Would you be able to weigh in over there please? Beorhtwulf (talk) 20:40, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rivals of the Ripper


Hello, AusLondonder. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rivals of the Ripper".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 11:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Move review
An editor has asked for a Move review of Grand Duchy of Kraków. Because you participated in the requested move, you might want to participate in the move review. Academicoffee71 (talk) 05:04, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at Articles_for_deletion/Killing_of_Patrick_Harman
You are invited to join the discussion at Articles_for_deletion/Killing_of_Patrick_Harman. Zazpot (talk) 07:31, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks, . I was rather pleased to find those edits and hopefully wipe the smug smirk of the vandal's face! AusLondonder (talk) 07:13, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Pietrykaŭ District
I tried to ping you, but sometimes pings do not work. Could you please have a look at what I wrote there? There is no hurry. Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:01, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Turkey
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Turkey. Winged Blades of Godric On leave 11:52, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

November editathons from Women in Red: Join us!
-Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Deletion of For Britain Edit
Hello AusLondoner, Can you supply your reason for your complete removal of my recent edit? --ThorpeCloud (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Certainly - I reverted your edit because it was far too lengthy and WP:UNDUE for an article of that size. It also gave too much weight to the opinion of Waters and was not reliably sourced to an independent, reliable, secondary source as required. AusLondonder (talk) 05:31, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Reactions to...
I recommend you or someone else start a discussion on "Reactions to..." question. I think the threshold is rather obvious: simple and almost unanimous condemnation, condolences, or whatever the trend may be needs to be met with deletion, a selective merge, or at least a completely different outlook on how these pages are written. Without an actual plan in place, I have little choice but to keep nominating these articles for deletion, and thus far participants have agreed with my rationale. Thanks for bringing that category to my attention; articles like this are simply ridiculous and fall under what Wikipedia is not.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 17:56, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Reverting of Edits October 2017
AusLondonder I watch with surprise how someone would just wake up to revert an edit that was fully sourced with 8 valids references, claiming the edit was not sourced and duly promotional. You just have to mention each sentence that was not backed up with a valid source and was promotional. KingMak1 (talk) 07:47, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Alert and question
BTW did you edit under any other account before?--Shrike (talk) 19:15, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I am fully aware of the discretionary sanctions, thank you. I don't appreciate your loaded question. AusLondonder (talk) 07:45, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I followed User:Shrike here, and am struck by the question. AusLononder and I met, I think, at Articles for deletion/2012 Paros (Greece) rape, a sort of baptism-by-fire for me, back when I was still a fairly new and utterly naive editor using a lot of pretty stupid arguments at AfD and making a lot of rookie mistakes.  He knew all the right things to say and turned the big guns on me - a memorable encounter.  Looking back in the light of Shrike's very pointed question, I am struck by the fact that AusLondonder, who had purportedly only been editing a few months at that point, already knew all the rules, the lingo, and the way to intimidate a newbie. , you do understand that there is little point to this unless you have some idea under what name AusLondonder previously edited.  He might merely be a very quick learner.  Nevertheless, AusLondonder, I think you should be able to give Shrike a straight answer to the question: Did you edit under any other account before?E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:16, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I really have no obligation to even engage with this ridiculous fishing expedition. Your disingenuous misrepresentation of the discuss on Articles for deletion/2012 Paros (Greece) rape is really outrageous and truly typical for you. You seem to have a real problem with the truth, E.M.Gregory. You suggest that you were a "newbie" at the AfD discussion but you had been editing for more than six months longer than me. You say I "knew all the right things to say and turned the big guns on me" but my argument was just WP:NOTNEWS and failure of WP:GNG but I lost the AfD and you won! I've gone back and completely read the AfD and I have no fucking idea what you are talking about. If I said all the right things and you made "rookie errors" why did only one editor agree with me? I'm guessing this is part of your tried and tested tactic of flinging enough mud and hoping some will stick. But it is not going to work with me, buddy. So, E.M.Gregory. How come you had so much experience and learnt so fast after you joined? What was your previous account? AusLondonder (talk) 03:35, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Anne Marie waters
Hi.

I am concerned that conservatives like AMW are being misrepresented by Wikipedia. I wonder if you can tell me why you think my edit is not impartial, given I have quoted AMW, ratger than someone else writing about her. If someone came to get an opinion of your political views, would you rather they asked you directly, or asked say me, who knows very little about you? This is what the Wikipedia entry for AMW is like. Lazy, heavily left leaning, and making no attempt whatsoever to hear what the real person has to say

Whether you know it or not, you have the power to censor the truth. You can claim that edits such as mine are being inaccurate or biased, but before you do, why not actually read what Ms. Waters has to say for herself? Go to Breitbart.com and read her articles. Listen to the Delingpole podcast interview with her. And then come back and tell me, with a straight face, that the Wikipedia entry isn't the most awful leftist propaganda.

Left or right, you have to acknowledge truth of an individual comes from their mouth, and no other.

Please also look up conservative, far right, democrat and British culture and values, to familiarise yourself with the claims

Andrew Ahg196 (talk) 08:30, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your comments . Wikipedia works on reliable sources. Per WP:WPNOTRS we also work mainly on the basis of secondary, and not primary, sources. Per WP:ABOUTSELF "Self-published and questionable sources" may be used in some contexts, but not if it is unduly self-serving or makes an exceptional claim. If Anne Marie Waters claims in an article she authored about herself that she is not an "anti-Islam activist" that seems to me both unduly self-serving and an exceptional claim, not supported by both her history of political activity and by reliable sources. Breitbart is not regarded as a reliable source at all. I cannot see how you would believe her article is "leftist propaganda", perhaps your own bias is showing? AusLondonder (talk) 17:35, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

AusLondoner - you seem to make a habit of altering items that don't fit your personal political views ? Not very helpful.

I stand by every single word I typed about Lady Nugee (AKA 'Emily Thornberry'). Please put them back and don't remove valid additions by British-born observers of the hypocritical side of British politics. Accurate123 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Accurate123 (talk • contribs) 15:55, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Secondary sources?
May I ask your credentials to edit a political piece on a British politician. Are you Austrian as your handle suggests? If so, may I ask what qualifies you to edit entries on Wikipedia on the British and their politics.

Secondary sources? This is truly a nonsense if ever I heard it. A politician is in the business of politics. They make their living from it. They have nothing to hide, what they are is their product. If you would rather hear the views of a right wing politician from secondary sources (which happens to be heavily left biased) you get all sorts of opinions which do not represent the person. What is the reasoning for prioritising secondary sources? Can you explain?

Andrew Ahg196 (talk) 19:05, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I am sorry you think our policies on sources are "nonsense". Unfortunately your personal opinion on sourcing requirements doesn't really matter. The reason you think everybody and everything is "left biased" is because you have your own (evidently very strong) political biases. Finally, Wikipedia is a global encyclopedia and not a Brexit fansite and I am certain I am an awful lot more qualified as an editor than yourself. AusLondonder (talk) 02:59, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

I know my personal opinion doesn't matter, but I will still express my opinion that your system is a nonsense. If you have a section titled political views, surely taking the person's actual statements about what they believe is more valid than a third party's opinion on their beliefs? If it doesn't, then BLP's should be ignored on Wikipedia as being pure propaganda.

I have not mentioned my views on the EU referendum, and for you to bring them up is concerning. Would it change your mind if I had voted remain? I am not interested in rubbishing anyone, I just feel they deserve a fair hearing. As a publication which prides itself in impartiality, Wikipedia and this editors like you who decide what goes and what doesn't, must at least hear out what people have to say.

Since my complaint, I found this article which explains a lot. I expect you'll tell me it's not a credible source - probably because it criticises Wikipedia.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/102601/how-left-conquered-wikipedia-part-1-david-swindle


 * FrontPage Magazine doesn't seem like a reliable source. It is effectively a blog published by two political activists. I'm surprised you think having neutral, non-promotional biographies of notable people is "a nonsense". This isn't a left/right issue, by the way. Our sourcing policies apply project-wide. What specifically do you think should be added to Waters' bio? AusLondonder (talk) 10:34, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Tobias socks
Since you seem to patrol the moves pages, if you come across more Tobias socks please mark for attention at the SPI or do let me know. Named socks can be reported directly at meta for global locking (he's globally banned). His disruption extends to Commons, Wikidata, de etc. cheers. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  14:21, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * No worries, will do. AusLondonder (talk) 14:24, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Look over a Maoism related article?
Hi! Long story short, I have a student that has created the Maoist Theory of National Struggle article. His first drafts of this were a little too much in the WP:ESSAY territory and had some other issues that you can read about here, if you like. (It's basically the history of the editing of the page and is more related to image issues at first.)

I saw that you edited the article on Maoism recently and your edit suggested that you're familiar with the topic area. I'm not really familiar with Maoism enough to know if this is something that would warrant its own article or not. The article seems to look good, but I do really want to have input from someone more familiar with Maoism. I'd be incredibly grateful if you could look it over! Another reason that I wanted to reach out to you is that I seem to remember that you're not a staunch deletionist. I don't want student work to be kept if it doesn't benefit Wikipedia, but I also don't really want an automatic knee jerk reaction, if that makes sense. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:30, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Murder of Janie Perrin
Hello, AusLondonder,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Murder of Janie Perrin should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Murder of Janie Perrin.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

 Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 22:18, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

New Year's resolution: Write more articles for Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Another Daily Mail RfC
There is an RfC at Talk:Daily Mail. Your input would be most helpful. --Guy Macon (talk) 16:07, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Category:Social Democratic Party (UK) MEPs has been nominated for discussion
Category:Social Democratic Party (UK) MEPs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bondegezou (talk) 10:46, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Wikimania scholarship application for SA and SADC
The South African Wikimedia chapter is awarding a limited number of full and partial scholarships to attend Wikimania 2018 in Cape Town to SADC and South African based Wikimedians. The due date for applications is 30 May. You can get more information by clicking here. Don't waste time APPLY NOW! (Google docs form provided by WMZA) 20:36, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Defence agencies of the European Union


A tag has been placed on Category:Defence agencies of the European Union requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — swpb T go beyond 16:16, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Betsie Verwoerd kleur.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Betsie Verwoerd kleur.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia Capacity Building Workshop
Wikimedia South Africa will be hosting Asaf Bartov from the Wikimedia Foundation for 5 days where he will be conducting a series of Capacity Building Workshops in Johannesburg and Cape Town. The workshops are aimed at addressing challenges faced by African Wikimedians and share tools that will enable them to better increase African content. In Johannesburg the workshops will take place on 25 - 26 May 2018 at the Goethe Institut, and in Cape Town Asaf will be meeting Wikimedians on 29 May 2018. Come and join us either in Johannesburg or Cape Town, we can pay for your travel to attend in either of these cities. You can click here to see more information or you can contact info@wikimedia.org.za. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:28, 20 May 2018 (UTC), delivered on behalf of

Women in Red June Editathons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of European Parliament election, 2019 (United Kingdom) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article European Parliament election, 2019 (United Kingdom) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/European Parliament election, 2019 (United Kingdom) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Vintage Feminist (talk) 16:29, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Application for WikiIndaba Steering Committee Open
The due date for applying to be part of the WikiIndaba steering committee (WISCom) is this Friday the 22nd. Apply now and be part of the African Wikimedia Movement. (Message from 10:57, 20 June 2018 (UTC))

John Iadarola
Per the discussion Articles for deletion/John Iadarola (2nd nomination) as Iadarola's career has grown, I have added additional sources covering his primary hosting of "True North" and "The Damage Report" series with additional non TYT sources. This is in addition to his daily hosting duties on the TYT main show. I have reactivated the article to mainspace. Trackinfo (talk) 07:53, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Elkins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Michael_Elkins check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Michael_Elkins?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Mid-Coast Council
Your recent edit to Mid-Coast Council is missing the reference "PMHC". You might like to fix that. Regards. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 18:29, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Category:Female critics of feminism has been nominated for discussion
Category:Female critics of feminism, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TM 20:36, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Angus Taylor (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North Sydney ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Angus_Taylor_%28politician%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Angus_Taylor_%28politician%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Regarding writing my first article on Wikipedia
How I write a good article on Wikipedia. Especially how to add references. Suppose I have read around 7-8 articles on any topic and then I wrote this in my own word. Then in that case if I add only 1-2 in-text citation and all references or I need to follow something different strategy. Please guide I am eagerly waiting to write first article which would be accepted in my first attempt. PRABHAKAR.S (talk) 05:10, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for the question. Your first article is a good first point of reference for advice on how to write a first article. You can also submit your article for review at Articles for creation, to help ensure it is not subject to deletion. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask. AusLondonder (talk) 05:08, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

I got the global city rankings from global city
The Global Power City Index from Tokyo from 2017 has London 1st. I have not been following Brexit negotiations closely and don't know how much decline of London a year of that has caused, maybe it's more than I'd guess? All I know is Theresa said negotiations stalled and if a breakthrough doesn't happen in some months it'll be a very disruptive hard Brexit. I'm not suggesting any city or pair of cities is as far ahead of the next one as Victorian London or New York of c.1953, that'll probably never happen again. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 15:20, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply and clarification. The Global Power City Index seems to me a rather subjective and biased index. Indeed as I understood it we were discussing power and importance of respective cities not things like their environment or accessibility nor their attractiveness to artists or managers. According to that index, neither Moscow nor Beijing even feature in the top ten global cities, which seems inexplicable. However, I appreciate you do have a basis for what you wrote and I'm happy to clarify I certainly intended no hard feelings towards you. AusLondonder (talk) 09:10, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Good catch, I didn't notice the weird methodology. At any rate the GaWC_study ranking next one down puts New York and London in the top tier but hasn't published since 2016(?), presumably Brexit would decrease London's degree of integration with the world economy that this ranking is most concerned about. Also the study is British. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 20:52, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Get ready for November with Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

About Kyiv-Pasazhyrskyi railway station

 * The page history doesn't seem to support this allegation of out-of-process moving. AusLondonder (talk) 10:32, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, not for you. Don't ask about this warning; it may have resulted from the G6'ing of the article. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me &#124; Contributions). This message was left at 11:28, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Penrith, New South Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Penrith ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Penrith%2C_New_South_Wales check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Penrith%2C_New_South_Wales?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Australia's head of state, again
Howdy. An Rfc at Monarchy of Australia has opened, concerning the topic head of state. GoodDay (talk) 20:29, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The City: London and the Global Power of Finance


The article The City: London and the Global Power of Finance has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not notable"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Philafrenzy (talk) 08:40, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Category:Parties that campaigned for leave during the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum, 2016 has been nominated for discussion
Category:Parties that campaigned for leave during the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum, 2016, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:52, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of 2018 West Footscray warehouse fire for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2018 West Footscray warehouse fire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2018 West Footscray warehouse fire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stephen 02:37, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

May you join this month's editathons from WiR!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:16, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

June events with WIR
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

July events from Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Category:Venezuela solidarity activists has been nominated for discussion
Category:Venezuela solidarity activists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.
 * Another editor started the CFD, but I thought you should be notified of the discussion. Anomalous+0 (talk) 20:52, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Socialism
Hello! I've noticed you have the WikiProject Socialism userbox in your user page, but you didn't sign up in the project. You can do so in the WikiProject Socialism page, clicking the Join WikiProject button. If you have any doubt, feel free to ask it in the WikiProject talk page. Best, --MarioGom (talk) 11:19, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

October Events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

December events with WIR
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2017 establishments in Cyprus


A tag has been placed on Category:2017 establishments in Cyprus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:00, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Murder of Margaret Gall for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Margaret Gall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Murder of Margaret Gall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 15:07, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

September Women in Red edithons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

October editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

December with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Proposed deletion of National Centre for Advanced Studies


The article National Centre for Advanced Studies has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable program"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Apologies for the template. Bearian (talk) 21:00, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

A New Year With Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

April editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Queering Wikipedia 2021 User Group Working Days: May 14–16
The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.

We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.

More information, and registration details, at QW2021 .--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 02:36, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Flemish Interest MEPs


A tag has been placed on Category:Flemish Interest MEPs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 15:21, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

August Editathons at Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

January 2022 Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Proposed deletion of Konstantinos Alyssandrakis


The article Konstantinos Alyssandrakis has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 18:37, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * it's obvious a former Member of the European Parliament meets WP:NPOL. I query why then you didn't follow the guidance at WP:BLPPROD. Step 2 before nomination "Consider finding reliable sources yourself" AusLondonder (talk) 16:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

March editathons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

April Editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Could you please move the page
Hi, 7 days ago you supported the move of the page 1987 Meerut communal riots. 7 days have elapsed and I don't know how to move a page. The move is under WP:CONSISTENT and can be justified under WP:RMUM. Could you move the page? >>> Extorc . talk  08:46, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, as it's a discussion started through requested moves and I have commented on the proposal it will probably be best to let another editor close it per Simple RM closing instructions. Another editor, or admin, may decide to relist the discussion per WP:RMRELIST because of low participation. Unfortunately the process is a bit beauracratic. AusLondonder (talk) 16:29, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Doesn't it qualify for move under WP:RMUM >>> Extorc . talk  17:45, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Email?
Any reason you don't have it active? I wanted to make a comment that might be better done in a private way. Nothing major, just a remark. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 12:23, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * No reason actually, just never activated it. I have activated it now. AusLondonder (talk) 20:57, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

PRODs
Hello, AusLondonder,

Thank you for PRODding these air strips and private-use "airports". I'm not sure why years ago some page creators thought they were notable enough for their own articles. If anything, they should have been placed on a country or state list of private airports, not have stand along articles. I appreciate you taking the time to find and tag them for deletion. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 21:12, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that and a special thanks to you for your excellent work as always :) AusLondonder (talk) 00:09, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

American Christian Academy (Tuscaloosa, Alabama)
I deprodded that article. I usually agree with you. I've developed it a bit and as they've had numerous state athletic championships, it's pretty clear this isn't a MILL school. As a matter of fact, I'm really curious why they'd drop such a successful track program. I'm going to reach out to an editor with more experience to research any segregation history that may be appropriate to use. Any chance you could move it to American Christian Academy (Alabama)? There are other schools by the same name, but in other states, making just the state name the correct disambiguation. It's much easier for a registered editor I understand. 174.212.212.106 (talk) 11:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for leaving a note. I'm happy to give time for improvements re sourcing and additional content. Happy to move as well given that seems quite a reasonable suggestion. AusLondonder (talk) 12:39, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

May Women in Red events
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

English Spelling
Hi. A few of your recent edits refer to Indian English when changing the spelling of some words. You should know that the idea that the use of "ize" is an Americanism is a recent fallacy, and Indian spelling generally uses British spelling, which has a long history of using both "ise" and "ize". Thanks. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 11:52, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I am well aware of Oxford spelling. However, Indian English uses -ise spelling. This is evident in usage by the government (see Indian Space Research Organisation, India Trade Promotion Organisation, Defence Research and Development Organisation), non-government bodies (All India Democratic Students Organisation) and the media. It is also supported by our Template:Indian English and the entire category tree of Category:Organisations based in India. AusLondonder (talk) 14:33, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * If we take the specific example of "analysed", I'm afraid what is says on Template:Indian English is not true. I wonder who was responsible for writing it? Here's Chetan Bhagat, a leading contemporary Indian author, spelling it "analyzed".  Here's the Indian Space Research Organisation doing the same.  Here's a one from the Ministry of Human Resource Development. The India Trade Promotion Organisation. Here's the Times of India.  India Today (with a bonus "urbanization" in the headline). The Hindu.
 * Indian spelling uses both forms, just like British English. So it's not really correct to change spellings on the basis that one is not Indian spelling. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 19:33, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * It's easy to cherry-pick specific individual uses of analyze. I can do that for analyse. It would seem to me of more weight that, for example, so many agencies of the Indian government use "organisation" in their name. I also disagree that -ize is acceptable in modern British English spelling outside of specific contexts, such as some academic publications. I note even the University of Oxford style guide recommends against -ize. AusLondonder (talk) 23:02, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

June events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in July 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Concern regarding Draft:Aaron Bastani
Hello, AusLondonder. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aaron Bastani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Aaron Bastani


Hello, AusLondonder. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aaron Bastani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 01:17, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red in August 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of Cat Selfies for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cat Selfies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cat Selfies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Rorshacma (talk) 02:35, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red in September 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red November 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Category:Books about West Papua
Category:Books about West Papua has been nominated for renaming; please see Categories for discussion/Log/2022 November 4. – Fayenatic  L ondon 15:26, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red December 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:52, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red January 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

January 2023
Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, WUSA (TV), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 13:37, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red in February 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red March 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:51, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Official Name is Gurugram
Hi to whomsoever it may concern. We cannot retain former names of cities, the current name is Gurugram and not Gurgaon. Why do we need rfc ? it is common sense? If that is the case, then we should retain the city names Bombay and Madras. The advise received in preceding section is some editor's personal opinion. Personal opinions doesn't work in this case. News paper articles can write anything, they just take info from wikipedia, it is called mirroring of wikipedia. Coming to books and articles, there are still millions of articles calling cities as Bombay and Madras before their official name change. You cant take it as a standard, and forcefully rub your opinions on other editors. Your personal interest with Gurgaon instead of Gurugram cannot be endorsed by other editors. The Govt officially designated it as Gurugram city in (Gurugram District) - https://gurugram.gov.in/department/municipal-corporation-gurugram/ Fostera12 (talk) 14:08, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
 * This post duplicates Talk:Gurgaon. – Uanfala (talk) 15:02, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red April 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Disambiguation link notification for April 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 United Kingdom local elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blue wall. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red May 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red - June 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:14, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red July 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red 8th Anniversary
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red August 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

September 2023 at Women In Red
--Victuallers (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of Ruann Coleman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ruann Coleman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ruann Coleman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. LibStar (talk) 23:57, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red October 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red - November 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red December 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red February 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red March 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Legends Cricket Trophy
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Legends Cricket Trophy. Robo<sup style="color:#707">Cric Let's chat  15:20, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Caliphate State, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The National.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Sam Corne
Hello, AusLondonder,

Please use Twinkle to tag pages for speedy deletion. Then when you select CSD G4, there is a field for you to put a link to the deletion discussion where it was decided to delete this article. It's necessary for patrolling admins to check and make sure there was an AFD for each article to verify the tagging and the tag you used provides no link to a relevant AFD discussion. So, this means that the admin will have to go looking for it themselves and the AFD might be under a different page title. What happens is that, most of the time, admins see this and just move on to some other task because it's a bit of a chore. So, this tagged article will probably sit around for some hours.

Twinkle is such a useful editing tool that does SO many things, you can use it to tag articles, report vandals to noticeboards, tag for a PROD, set up an AFD discussion, maintain a deletion log for you, it's a tool I use all day when editing and I encourage you to try it out if you haven't used it yet. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 03:51, 11 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks for your message. I do use Twinkle for AFDs, thanks for the reminder to use for speedy deletion. On a side note I am now thinking the Sam Corne article may not be sufficiently identical to the previous one deleted, but the AfD was at Articles for deletion/Sam Corne.
 * AusLondonder (talk) 05:21, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Also to add to my comment I edit on mobile 95% of the time, I know I can use Twinkle just need to select Desktop view, but that's probably why I haven't been doing it always. AusLondonder (talk) 05:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Sam Corne
Hello AusLondonder, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sam Corne, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not sufficiently identical to the deleted version. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 21:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC)


 * This templated message isn't quite right. Thank you for looking out for potential G4 candidates. There's no way for you to know if it's identical or not, so you may as well tag. I might be less likely to do so when there's been so long a period since the AfD. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 21:14, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Cover Image (copywrite free) on Why Bharat Matters
Hi AusLondonder, I have left a message for you on Talk:Why Bharat Matters. Could you please have a look at it? Waonderer (talk) 18:09, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Te Whatu Ora. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Also at Talk:European settlers in New Zealand BilledMammal (talk) 05:10, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
 * This is completely ridiculous. My comments at the RM were not a personal attack. If I see editors engaging in culture wars and POV-pushing, I will call out it out. I am not the only one to notice your behaviour. Above I see ANI referrals, 1RR breaches and editor disputes. There's no question you were engaging in a culture war at Talk:Jewish exodus from the Muslim world when nine of ten editors opposed you, many forcefully with very strong arguments. AusLondonder (talk) 06:18, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
 * At Talk:European settlers in New Zealand your complete argument against the move was This issue has been discussed enough already and I consider the latest RM to be disruptive. Simple question for the nom: What has changed since the previous RMs? If consensus goes against you, you should not simply try and exhaust other editors by repeating the process with a flawed argument every couple of years. Other editors have set out above, in detail, why this proposal is flawed and why the existing name is appropriate. This is disruptive behaviour that should not be rewarded.
 * At Talk:Te Whatu Ora, your argument started with Just the latest instalment of the Wikipedia culture wars brought to us by a certain editor. It is better than your !vote at European settlers in New Zealand, as it does go on to include an argument that isn't just an attack on an editor, but neither is acceptable - if you see an issue with an editor, bring it up, with evidence, on their talk page or at ANI. It is inappropriate, and against policy, to bring it up on an article talk page.
 * I'm not sure why you removed this and instead responded on my talk page, but please do not do so again - if you feel the need for further response then please do so here, to keep the discussion in a single thread. BilledMammal (talk) 06:44, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Also, please don't WP:HOUND me - turning up to take a position against mine immediately after I raise this issue, on an article you haven't engaged with since 2017, in a discussion started five days ago, strongly suggests you are following my edits. BilledMammal (talk) 06:49, 16 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Please do not tell me how I construct my arguments at RMs. It was directly relevant to the RM to note that the nominator has a pattern of POV-pushing and engaging in culture wars. I note all three of the RMs in question were highly controversial and one was opposed 9-1. What I have done is go to ANI to have a look at what other editors have been saying about your behaviour and to say you're well-acquainted with that particular venue there is an understatement. I've been editing Wikipedia longer than yourself but have never been involved in anywhere near the level of disputes you have with other editors. Rather than always saying everyone else is in the wrong, why don't you consider why it is you have major disputes with so many editors? In January this year you were subject to significant criticism at ANI where a long-standing, well-respected editor stated that "I’ve long been concerned about BilledMammal's conduct (BATTLEGROUND is an apt description)" while another stated "BilledMammal's editing goes quite far with one-sided editing and attempts to defend it, and I'd call such edits as mentioned a blatant violation of NPOV and collegial spirit." Remember back in March 2022 when you said "it is clear that in general how I engage in discussion is not ideal, and even if this discussion is closed without action I will take any criticism onboard and attempt to adjust my behaviour to address it" but yet here we are again - you labelling editorial criticism personal attacks, accusing other editors of hounding for contributing to one discussion you're involved in. As a veteran editor said at the March 2022 ANI thread "My brief encounters with BM, gave me the impression that he argues for the enjoyment of arguing." Nothing has changed, has it? AusLondonder (talk) 07:24, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Per WP:PA: Do not make personal attacks anywhere on Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor.
 * Saying that the nominator has a pattern of POV-pushing and engaging in culture wars is commenting on the contributor, not content, and is against policy; I'm asking you politely to stop. If you believe there is an issue with my conduct that needs discussing, PA tells you what the appropriate forums are. BilledMammal (talk) 07:31, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
 * As I said, nothing has changed with the way you behave. You have been asked politely to stop battleground behaviour and POV-pushing but after each time-wasting ANI encounter you say you'll change (" I will take any criticism onboard and attempt to adjust my behaviour") but nothing ever changes. You still view Wikipedia as an ideological fight to win. Eventually, the community will tire of an editor who enjoys conflict and argument. AusLondonder (talk) 07:40, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Stop you mass deletions
Hello, You are misunderstanding Wikipedia's guidelines. The requirements you refer to for notability are sufficient, but not necessary for an article to be notable. Your selective choice of articles that you promote for deletion makes it appear that you are on a crusade against the IPSC. Sauer202 (talk) 11:51, 16 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi there, I have never previously heard of IPSC. Why would I have something against it? These insinuations and conspiracy theories are not constructive. I have no need to defend myself but if you see my contributions I frequently nominate articles for deletion, the majority of which are subsequently deleted. I'm not sure what you mean regarding the notability of organisations. WP:NORG states that the policy applies to "commercial and non-commercial activities, such as charitable organizations, political parties, hospitals, institutions, interest groups, social clubs, companies, partnerships, proprietorships, for-profit educational institutions or organizations, etc." This obviously includes the articles in question. When you created a large number of wholly unsourced articles would you not expect that to be an issue? AusLondonder (talk) 12:48, 16 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello, Your are posting a factual error that the articles in question were unsourced. I can agree that they were undersourced and could need improvement. I would be glad to improve them given a couple of days. However, I think it is not fruitful that they are speedily deleted and that editors are not given a chance to improve the articles. As mentioned, these stubs have been on the Wiki for about 10 years. While the notability guidelines set sufficient parameters for notability, they do not necessarily say these are necessary requirements. Nevertheless, I feel the approach of mass deletions harms the project. In my eyes, it seems like you may have gotten into a rhythm where you can not see the forest for the trees. Sauer202 (talk) 08:05, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I won't nominate any more for deletion for the next few days, to give you time to begin improvements. Unfortunately though you are wrong regarding notability requirements for organisations. Per WP:ORGCRIT: "A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is presumed notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." This applies to all organisations. This is part of WP:NORG; "The scope of this guideline covers all groups of people organized together for a purpose" Finally, to clarify, the articles deleted were in fact wholly unsourced. Some featured external links, others featured dead external links. That is not considered sourcing. AusLondonder (talk) 12:22, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Aus, you really need to stop.   Burt Harris (talk) 20:56, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Editor experience invitation
Hi AusLondonder :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss 🍀  (talk) 07:09, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Lynwood
On the topic of unnotable lists of mayors, you may want to look at List of mayors of Lynwood, California, a city of just under 70,000 that seems to have mostly primary sourcing. I am unsure if it meets WP:NLIST but it doesn't seem to be an especially notable topic to me. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 17:35, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Candidates and AFD
I think we get non-policy !votes when there is an AfD of a US senatorial candidate close to an election. I think it is better to clean up the article and then consider what to do with the article after the election is in the rear view mirror. - Enos733 (talk) 22:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Yeah although I frankly think many of the !votes at that AfD should be disregarded, but I can't see an admin closing as delete or redirect now. AfD has pretty much become a purely numbers game these days, an AfD I started recently was closed as keep despite several editors literally advancing complete falsehoods as justification for keeping. It's a pretty dumb precedent to be setting that people can be notable purely for coverage they receive as an election candidate. AusLondonder (talk) 02:33, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * And our community has and is moving away from any presumption of notability. - Enos733 (talk) 15:26, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Help with RfC summary
Hello, could you help with closing the RfD on David Lammy talk page and summarising? It seems there's a slim consensus on a change to British? but I do not want to make a mistake. Never done this before. Erzan (talk) 22:40, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Radio stations
Hey, want to just leave a message. A lot of the LPFMs and such that are unsourced are tough to put a source on, but if you want to run something by me, please do. I know where to look for at least reasonable resources, especially for stations that started in the pre-internet era. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:12, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Geriatricists
Wikipedia only has about 70 articles that have been placed in the geriatricists category. With that few I think we would be best off merging all of them. I really think we need to create a rule that we will not subdivide any occupation by nationality if we have under 100 articles on people who did it. This especially applies when it is a sub-cat of physicians/medical doctors, who are a sub-cat of scientists. If this was a top level occupation kline barbers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:36, 24 March 2024 (UTC)


 * on further review we have 81 articles in the barners category, and have not subdivided them at all. At least one is disambiguation as a historian. I have no clue if all of these really ought to be in the batlrber category. I also have no clue if all those in "geriatricists" really belong there, some may be doctors who we would argue do not quite make the cut. The main point is that we can and do for dome occupations not divide by nationality. I see no reason why geriatricists cannot be such a nomination.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:40, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Review my article
Can You Review My article.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amalda_Liz Warrantys (talk) 12:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

List_of_websites_blocked_in_the_United_States
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:List_of_websites_blocked_in_the_United_States Ironcurtain2 (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

There are currently thousands of websites blocked in the United States. a TikTok may be banned soon too, as there is pending legislation about it. TikTok is banned on some government phones.
 * United States Federal Government;

Currently websites such as .... are blocked in certain states, and illegal ... content is taken down in the United States. Ironcurtain2 (talk) 08:00, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Websites blocked in certain states

Women in Red April 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of Where is Kate? for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Where is Kate? is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. IgnatiusofLondon ( he/him • ☎️) 11:37, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Draft: Bhai Roop Chand
Hi, I am komaldeeppunni a student editor on Wikipedia. I was working on this article Bhai Roop Chand. Earlier, I uploaded an unfinished version of the article and the article was moved to the Draft: Bhai Roop Chand. Now I have added more information in the article with suitable sources. I request you to examine the revised draft of the article and possibly move it to the main space. Komaldeeppunni (talk) 21:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Radio station deletions
I don't disagree that these database-sourced articles don't demonstrate notability but per WP:ATD I believe it would be better to redirect them to the appropriate List of... articles. I will continue to assert this in my WP:PRODPATROLING unless there is some indication from WP:AFD or WP:MFD that deletion is preferred by the community. We could save each other both some work if you used WP:BLAR instead of WP:PROD for these. ~Kvng (talk) 17:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't really agree that all these articles need redirects. I'm not sure that the community consensus is to favour redirect over delete. Within the last month, multiple radio station articles I've taken to AfD have been deleted: see Articles for deletion/KEAA-LP, Articles for deletion/WFHA-LP (2nd nomination) and Articles for deletion/KMAC (FM). I'm also not certain redirects are called for per WP:RPURPOSE. Many of these list articles such as List of radio stations in Alaska and List of radio stations in Wyoming are wholly unsourced by the way. AusLondonder (talk) 10:13, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply. I will keep watching the AfDs. The examples you link to are not yet convincing me that there is a community preference for deleting over redirecting in this subject area. ~Kvng (talk) 12:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Redirected

 * 1) Articles for deletion/KBBV-CD
 * 2) Articles for deletion/WLOG (FM)
 * 3) Articles for deletion/WCQT-LD
 * 4) Articles for deletion/WOOH-LD
 * 5) Articles for deletion/WOCW-LD
 * 6) Articles for deletion/KCCC-LP
 * 7) Articles for deletion/KHMG

Deleted

 * 1) Articles for deletion/KEAA-LP - no redirect target idententified
 * 2) Articles for deletion/WFHA-LP (2nd nomination) - no WP:ATD discussion
 * 3) Articles for deletion/KMAC (FM) - no WP:ATD discussion
 * 4) Articles for deletion/KVQT-LD - no WP:ATD discussion
 * 5) Articles for deletion/KKGU - no WP:ATD discussion


 * Of the redirects, all but one of those are television stations, and two of them were redirected to articles about parent companies rather than poorly sourced lists. Of those deleted, AfDs were attended by experienced editors aware of the option to redirect, so the lack of specific discussion of ATD doesn't seem overly relevant to me. AusLondonder (talk) 13:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
 * You seem to be implying that we should be considering television stations separately. I think they fall under the same issue of stations previously presumed notable due to licensing.
 * I take your point that experienced editors should know about WP:ATD, that doesn't seem to be universally the case though. If you can find some examples where a specific redirect was suggested and then rejected by others in the discussion or by the closer, that would be persuasive.
 * I will try to add to the above lists as this develops. ~Kvng (talk) 13:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
 * All AfDs I've been watching have closed. All your recent station AfDs have closed as redirect. ~Kvng (talk) 01:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Hmm that's weird, Articles for deletion/KKGU closed as delete yesterday. AusLondonder (talk) 01:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * That wasn't one I was watching. I'm not sure why. I've added it to the list though. Now that it has been deleted, I can't determine whether I was ever involved. I clearly wasn't involved in the AfD.
 * The pattern is clear for this set of articles though. Whenever a reasonable redirect target is suggested at AfD (parent company or list), it is accepted. Again, if you know of an exception to this, I'd be interested to see it. ~Kvng (talk) 13:42, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Please stop prodding these radio station articles. ~Kvng (talk) 17:23, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Sorry? AusLondonder (talk) 19:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
 * , ~Kvng (talk) 20:14, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Why are you asking me to please stop placing PROD tags? AusLondonder (talk) 20:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
 * From my initial post above, ...per WP:ATD I believe it would be better to redirect them to the appropriate List of... articles. ~Kvng (talk) 21:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Alex Bhathal
Hello AusLondonder, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Alex Bhathal, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: G4: not substantially identical; much new information since the page's deletion 8 years ago. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the note. I can't see the deleted version, although I suspected it may have changed slightly with more elections contested. AusLondonder (talk) 13:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's a problem with this criterion, if you could see the deleted version then you wouldn't need to tag it to delete in the first place. The eight-year-old deleted version was basically a promotional profile of a non-notable candidate contesting their first election. They seem to have acquired some notability as a perennial candidate in the meantime (I didn't look too closely) but you could list at AFD if you think notability is still not there. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Re: G4 deletions. A clue for non-admins who can't see previously deleted articles: I've learned to check the references -- if any of them are newer than the article deletion date, then it's not the same article. (Maybe it's very similar but since I don't know for sure, I don't recommend a speedy G4 deletion). -- A. B. (talk • contribs •  global count)  16:52, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Deepak Narwal
@AusLondonder you think it's a bad article? Any chances to help it? 2001:14BA:4C18:F400:7876:2711:9C0:693A (talk) 10:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * @AusLondonder 404 2001:14BA:4C18:F400:7876:2711:9C0:693A (talk) 10:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi, are you the article creator? AusLondonder (talk) 11:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Username reporting
"Egregious username" usually only means particularly vulgar usernames or particularly offensive/denigrating usernames, not promotional usernames. I can't speak to another situation without knowing what it was. I'm happy to discuss this further at WT:U. 331dot (talk) 19:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red May 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Disruptive: nominations for deletions
I have to say you history for disruptive editing seems quite concerning.

You seem to have not made any attempts to verify information in Suzette Kent - Wikipedia before proposing to delete it.

Deletion might be approprate if :


 * 1) Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms, original theories and conclusions, and hoaxes
 * 2) Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed.

The references, including the national archives, and journalistic articles are pretty clear.

What attempts to find reliable sources have you made?

Burt Harris (talk) 20:18, 29 April 2024 (UTC)


 * "you history for disruptive editing seems quite concerning." What the hell are you talking about? AusLondonder (talk) 23:22, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

CSD removals
They're micronations, so by definition, someone can make them up one day. This is a great criterion for deletion (cf. Wikipedia is not for things made up one day), but that's not a criterion for speedy deletion, since we can't verify that they're vandalism. Remember that hoaxes are generally not speedy deletion candidates, and "only in extreme cases of blatant and obvious hoaxes should articles be tagged for speedy deletion as db-hoax". Nyttend (talk) 02:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC)


 * We can verify by a simple search. One search produced no results other than Wikipedia. G3 explicitly applies to blatant hoaxes. AusLondonder (talk) 07:16, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The People's Independent Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Localism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Bassam Mahfouz
Why did you create Bassam Mahfouz in mainspace, when we already had Draft:Bassam Mahfouz? Why did you not move it into mainspace first? Edwardx (talk) 16:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Bassam Mahfouz


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Bassam Mahfouz. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Draft:Bassam Mahfouz. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Draft:Bassam Mahfouz. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Edwardx (talk) 16:35, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red June 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Category:Books about David Cameron has been nominated for merging
Category:Books about David Cameron has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 11:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red July 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

WP:ANYBIO at AfD
Hello - I've only just become aware of this thread recently, so I couldn't participate in it. It appears the discussion has become stale. Is there any chance of reviving it? — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 10:04, 7 July 2024 (UTC)