Talk:Network of Free Ulema – Libya

Woefully biased article
How can you allow this article, which has been written by a single contributor whose only other contributions here seem to be about Aref Ali Nayed, to appear on Wikipedia without a thorough revision to correct its inherent bias? It reads like a propaganda announcement for the organisation and the cause of the Libyan rebels. This is not encyclopedic. I am not saying that because I am pro- or anti-, I'm merely concerned with the editorial impartiality of Wikipedia -- this is just the opposite of a neutral, balanced, dispassionate encyclopedic article and is a disgrace to Wikipedia. 85.211.62.194 (talk) 01:08, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
 * This is the typical example of why Wikipedia aint reliable on history or politics-related articles. The worst is that when people denounce this type of things, they are usually verbally attacked by this type of "pseudorevolutionary web partisans" as "pro-Gaddafi", "pro-dictatorship", etc... Thats what happens when WP is guided by lobbies instead of users.--HCPUNXKID (talk) 12:01, 20 November 2012 (UTC)