Talk:Nonclassic eicosanoid

This term is without of relevance
I'm really suprised about this differenciation into eicosanoids and nonclassic eicosanoids. So far I know, currently it is not common to divide like this, the term "eicosanoids" is usual to describe all the nonclassic eicosanoids as well. The references in this article underlining the relevance of "nonclassic eicosanoids" as a term, are old. So, it is confusing to use this term in wikipedia here... I attended the conference "winter eicosanoids" this month in Baltimore, and I can't remember that the term "nonclassical eicosanoid" was mentioned, despite talking about this group of compounds. So if nobody can show the current relevance of this term, this articel should be deleted. Some indications that this term was sometimes mentioned in the past, might be content for the introduction of eicosanoid. Ok? --Max schwalbe (talk) 16:12, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 01:27, 30 April 2016 (UTC)