Talk:Norton Rose Fulbright

Untitled
Norton Rose Group

Information updated in light of Ogilvy Renault and Deneys Reitz joining Norton Rose Group; Key people added; Expertise areas added; Number of lawyers, employees and offices updated; ‘History’ amended to show NR OR LLP and NRSA are now a part of NRG.

Group added to ‘Norton Rose’ to make ‘Norton Rose Group’. Officially, Norton Rose does not exist. It should either be presented as the relevant entity (e.g. Norton Rose Studio Legale) or as Norton Rose Group when talking about the practice collectively. Please do not remove the word Group from Norton Rose Group when referring to it in text.

09 June 2011

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.116.24.237 (talk) 15:28, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Please explain changes.--Mediterraneo (talk) 21:46, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Fulbright merger
Additional news item, which might seem redundant if added to article, leaving it to your judgement to include. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 14:03, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Norton Rose Fulbright. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151007102458/http://law-and-business.net/the-future-of-law-is-bright-with-norton-rose-fulbright/ to http://law-and-business.net/the-future-of-law-is-bright-with-norton-rose-fulbright/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:41, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

COI
There have been several single use accounts/editors that have puffed up the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Histnewbie (talk • contribs) 00:47, 5 February 2019 (UTC)