Talk:Nuclear Information and Resource Service

Untitled
So it appears that the NIRS logo was erased, perhaps this was not properly credited to us or the public domain in the wikimedia space. Can anyone help get this back - it is located on the NIRS.ORG website

thx Paxuscalta 07:45, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Double Takes
As a reader unfamilar with the organization, I want to point out some thoughts on a few facts and wording. The statement: Specialists at NIRS offer more than 100 years of combined experience on the environmental, health and safety detriments of nuclear power. Makes the NIRC sound really small. 100 years of combined experience typically means half a dozen people at most. And then, Together with its partner WISE (World Information Service on Energy), NIRS outreach spans the globe, with 14 offices on five continents [1]. seems just slightly misleading since it doesn't say who's offices they are, WISE of NIRS. In the case of the later, it sounds slightly contradictory to the previous quote there. And in general I don't think a reader DOES get an idea of the size and scope of the NIRS by reading it.

Anyway, just wanted to point that out in case it was of use to any of you. Happy editing! theanphibian 22:27, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

stances
Who exactly is in favour of "ineffective reprocessing"?CyrilleDunant 09:37, 17 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Your edits have been helpful; however, please don't revert my edits. I don't see the point of changing good prose and removing factual information. As for "ineffective reprocessing," I'm sure that some people are opposed to effective reprocessing if it costs more money than they want to spend, just like with any other industry.Athene cunicularia 04:25, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * By definition, this would be ineffective :). As for my edits, it is completely irrelevant that n people where left without electricity after an earthquake, because this could have any cause: destroyed lines, automatic emergency shutdown of the plant, broken lightbulbs. It is an ineffective sentence which tries to say that the earthquake was major and ends up saying the opposite. As it stands, I think the link suffices if someone wishes to have information about the earthquake.
 * Also, quotes ought to be in italics. Or using the quote template if extensive.CyrilleDunant 05:43, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

on USPOV
World Information Service on Energy redirects here, but the article is mostly about nirs, although it says it has merged with the WISE? -- eiland (talk) 15:47, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

i pulled the US POV message after adding a section about the WISE international relays which are part of the network and the multiple non-English languages which the newsletter is publish in. --Paxuscalta (talk) 11:35, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:


 * http://www.power-technology.com/features/feature-world-worst-nuclear-power-disasters-chernobyl/
 * Triggered by  on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 13:14, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

✅ This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 21:02, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Other Double Takes
As a reader only slightly familar with the organization, I want to point out some thoughts on a few facts and wording. The statement: Critics accuse NIRS of fearmongering and question the qualifications of NIRS staff to adequately assess the safety of nuclear energy. No NIRS staff member is credited with formal training in nuclear physics or engineering.9 is unhelpful. I note that no paid staff member of our local American Lung Association is an M.D. This lack of low-paid staffer medical degrees doesn't in fact make the Lung Association medically deficient. This cheap stunt smells like the work of the nuclear industry's well-funded troll farm. I ask that the Wikipedia brain trust be officially on alert for such hacking attempts against their institution. Paul Klinkman (talk) 22:59, 2 February 2022 (UTC)