Talk:Nucleus basalis

Unreliable source
Why is Robert Twigger's comments about function taken as truth? He has no training in neurology or neuroscience.
 * Thanks for your observations. Wikipedia's an encyclopedia that anyone can contribute to, if you feel this statement is unreliable (and I agree with you that it is), please feel free to remove it. Cheers, --Tom (LT) (talk) 21:34, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Requested move 6 March 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved Primefac (talk) 12:55, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Nucleus basalis of Meynert → Nucleus basalis – TA preferred name, avoids use of eponym, easier and much more widely used Google search and ngrams Iztwoz (talk) 21:27, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree. Nucleus basalis is now more common and in this case makes perfect sense.Gcastellanos (talk) 18:53, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Support per above proposal. --Tom (LT) (talk) 22:34, 12 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.