Talk:Oura Health

Notability Issues
Should we nominate this article for deletion? It already has multiple issues, and only two sources, one of which is a press release. I'm not saying the company isn't notable, but that the text as is is problematic. PetesPizza (talk) 18:18, 21 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep but needs improvement. - Indefensible (talk) 19:19, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Sources for Membership and Accuracy
The only sources for the Membership and Accuracy parts of the article are youtube videos, one about the membership and two about the accuracy of their products. I am not sure whether or not these sources are reliable enough to base whole paragraphs on. Especially the videos about accuracy are primarily anecdotal evidence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8071:22A5:D000:0:0:0:A3AB (talk) 14:54, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

In addition to that, the same youtuber who is mentioned as a source for the improved qualitiy of the sleep tracking of the Oura 3 does not come to this conclusion in his own test of the Oura Ring 3 (->youtube. com /watch?v=MlIbhv2cWoE) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8071:22A5:D000:0:0:0:A3AB (talk) 15:24, 31 January 2022 (UTC)