Talk:Overachievement

Proposed deletion - 2004
From Votes for deletion/Overachievement:

From Cleanup: Overachievement is a 2-sentence sub stub, and if NPOV'd right now would end up as 1 sentence dict. def. (moved from Cleanup by SimonP)
 * Keep. --Daniel C. Boyer 15:28, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Something could be written about this.    &mdash; Lady Lysine Ikinsile 21:38, Jun 18, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Jxg 02:34, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Dicdef written by an underachiever. Denni &#9775; 23:15, 2004 Jun 20 (UTC) Excellent rewrite, Change to keep. Denni &#9775;  08:54, 2004 Jun 24 (UTC)
 * But the wonderful thing about Wikipeia is that anyone can edit articles, even those that aren't bitter underachievers ;-). User:Rossami has completely rewritten this article and it's now a perfectly nice stub.    &mdash; Lady Lysine Ikinsile 04:07, 2004 Jun 21 (UTC)
 * Keep. Rewritten version is a valuable article (maybe not even deserving the "stub" message) about the educational context; room for expansion about other uses. JamesMLane 12:06, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Ilyanep 23:42, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Question
Who is Catherine Raley, and why was her name considered relevant in reverse? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.169.19.121 (talk) 09:50, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

NPOV
This article is rife with npov issues - seems extremely biased against high achievement in some sections (specifically, university students and workplace). This issue was apparently raised before based upon the talk page history. -- Seppi333 (talk) 17:07, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Adult Development Fall 2023
— Assignment last updated by Jskalski (talk) 21:28, 6 November 2023 (UTC)