Talk:PCPaint

2007 speedy
A tag has been placed on PCPaint, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Rjgodoy 22 May 2007.


 * I removed the deletion. The deletion message states "You may remove this message if you improve the article, or if you otherwise object to deletion of the article for any reason. To avoid confusion, it helps to explain why you object to the deletion, either in the edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, it should not be replaced."


 * I don't understand your position on blatant advertsing. I disagree entirely. Specifically what does a 55 year old Canadian Software developer possibly hope to gain by advertising a product that has not been sold for 22 years?


 * Regardless let's work together to get this cleaned-up. Please don't make it so difficult for me to contribute to Wikipedia. This is not a "closed shop". --Bill Buckels 14:22, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I can not understand the point about the shop ;-). I have already explained the other part below as per post of 20070522T0546 Rjgodoy 15:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Saw your comments below:( --Bill Buckels 17:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Hangon
PCPaint is historically significant because it was the first GUI graphics program for the PC. It was widely distributed by Mouse Systems and widely used for several years in the early transition period before Windows. Lyricanjl 05:33, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I put db-spam because of the "need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic" part of CSD#G11... something like WikiProject Biography but about a (now discontinued) product. Since my speedy nomination was controversial I am considering prod. If contested it would became afd. Note that there are references, but they are unused in the article, and it is not clear how the references endorse the actual content. The subject may be notable, but notability must be asserted somewhere in the article. There are only 2 unsourced sentences which serve this goal: "bundled with millions of mice" and "the best-selling PC paint program of the late 1980s ". Rjgodoy 05:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I have fixed the references. Regardless, Wikipedia and the rest of the world needs this information. This is a very important part of computing history, a history that many of us still remember, about our lives, and not about a discontinued product. Please help me get this into the proper format. --Bill Buckels 13:19, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: (arguments to avoid in deletion discussions) "It is interesting" WP:INTERESTING, "It is useful" WP:Useful.

About the "important part of computing history" argument, this statement should be asserted by reliable sources (I haven't read the new version of the article... I'll talk about it later) Rjgodoy 15:09, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I am a reliable source. The reason that the rest of the world needs this specific information is that it tells them where the Paintbrush program originated on the IBM PC. That part of computing history is important to me, so why shouldn't it be important to others enjoyed that period of time? Despite all that...


 * If I buy your argument that in order to be a reliable source one must be published by academia and/or by a commercial publisher, I think I would reverse my position and simply say that why people need this information is not for you or for me to decide.


 * That is like asking an accountant why anyone would need UML to describe a computer system. Ivar Jacobsen said at the Rational Symposium in Toronto in 1998 that "We used to build doghouses, now we build REAL HOUSES"? As I joined in the applause, I laughed out loud at the two slides on the overhead, one of a decrepit old doghouse and the other of a wonderful Fairfield County-like mansion. At that moment, I knew what I needed to tell our senior management in order to justify the high-cost of those RUP licences for my developers. However, if some looming paternal entity had censored Ivar's content before he had the chance to disseminate it I probably never would have been able to make my case.


 * Not a great argument I admit:( --Bill Buckels 17:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * "Reliable sources" (WP:RS) is considered a guideline on Wikipedia. Discussion about existing and proposed policies would be best addressed in the Village pump. "Reliable sources are credible published materials with a reliable publication process; their authors are generally regarded as trustworthy, or are authoritative in relation to the subject at hand. The reliability of a source depends on context; what is reliable in one topic may not be in another. A world-renowned mathematician may not be a reliable source on topics of biology. In general, a topic should use the most reliable sources available to its editors." This concern is separated of "why people need this information", about which we are not discussing (I think). Rjgodoy 23:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Cite
Hi can anyone find a cite for this : "Mouse Systems bundled PCPaint with millions of mice that they shipped, making PCPaint also the best-selling PC paint program of the late 1980s." --Lwarf 10:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I have fixed the references. See the history of PCPaint. --Bill Buckels 13:19, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I have added a footnote for the bundling, but finding numbers for the number of mice sold over 20 years ago is proving elusive. I am continuing my search on that.  Lyricanjl 01:05, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:PCPaintDemoHouse.gif
Image:PCPaintDemoHouse.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:23, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:PCPaintDemoPlanets.gif
Image:PCPaintDemoPlanets.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:23, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:PCPaintDemoSailingWorkBorders.gif
Image:PCPaintDemoSailingWorkBorders.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:24, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:PCPaintv2.00AboutScreen.gif
Image:PCPaintv2.00AboutScreen.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:24, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:World m Pnt.gif
Image:World m Pnt.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 16:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Pcpaintplusback.jpg
Image:Pcpaintplusback.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:41, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Pcpaintplusfront.jpg
Image:Pcpaintplusfront.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:42, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on Pictor Paint

 * ''Copy+paste from now redirected Talk:Pictor Paint. –Be..anyone (talk) 10:29, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:


 * http://www.programmersheaven.com/download/2157/Zipfilelist.aspx
 * Triggered by  on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 18:47, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * removed. –Be..anyone (talk) 15:19, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Pictor Paint
Pictor Paint is a hopeless stub with shaky notability. Please merge it into this (better) article as section. –Be..anyone (talk) 15:29, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Implementing this now&hellip; I've inserted one old discussion from the also redirected Talk:Pictor Paint page above JFTR (and a proper history merge would be a major headache requiring admin rights.) –Be..anyone (talk) 10:29, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

GLPaint
Same procedure, a hopeless GLPaint stub, maybe related to GLPro, certainly related to PCPaint, merge it here (everything interesting is anyway already covered here.) For yet another maybe malware infested stub GRASP GL library format I tried a PROD. –Be..anyone (talk)
 * Agreed and ✅ Klbrain (talk) 02:45, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Information in article is wrong as of March 23
“In February 1983, Wolfgram traveled to SoftCon in New Orleans where he demonstrated the program to Mouse Systems. Mouse Systems was developing an optical mouse and they wanted to bundle a painting program so they agreed to bundle in Mouse Draw.”
 * **the dates are wrong here. wolfgram couldn’t have possibly bought a MS Mouse in 81, because they weren’t sold until 83 and he couldn’t have demo it in feb as the ms mouse came out in May 83**Manboobies (talk) 17:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC)