Talk:Pan-Slavic language

Translations
Could someone translate the examples in this article? Thank you Gwaka Lumpa (talk) 18:11, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Fiat Lingua
, regarding this edit: since I am the author of the article in question, I will not revert, but let me please point out that you have clearly misunderstood the nature of Fiat Lingua: the sentence you quoted ("we will accept anything conlang-related") simply refers to its scope. It does not change the fact that it is a peer-reviewed journal ("All articles are subject to editing and review."]). My article was reviewed by David J. Peterson (the editor-in-chief), prof. Jessie Sams and a third person whose name I can't remember at the moment. In addition, the article contains no less than 142 references, so that practically every statement comes with evidence.

For the rest, I agree with you with regard to editorialising. The way Slovio has been propagated by its author is utterly untruthful, but that does not mean that it doesn't have its merits: it is quite a complete and workable language, it has been subject to various academic research, it was the first Slavic-based conlang that had anything like a following (ca. 15 users is still more than most other auxlangs can boast), and it plays a significant role in the early beginnings of Interslavic. It definitely deserves an adequate and neutral description, which would include these facts, but also mention the political aspect and the propaganda. &mdash;IJzeren Jan Uszkiełtu?  00:35, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

'by 2021 its user community had grown to over 15,000 people'
That's a very clever way of suggesting that there are 15 000 people who actually use it, as opposed to 15 000 people who liked its Facebook page or whatever.--178.249.169.67 (talk) 01:02, 12 February 2022 (UTC)