Talk:Party of Shariy

Just slander
Vif12vf I think that edit of EricLewan about ideology, languge and in particular about promoting Eurosceptic - just fake. I have all the proofs that this is just defamation --Maxim victory1990 (talk) 07:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)


 * This Wikipedia article is a mess full of Wikipedia guideline errors. Why is there a whole section about a very unimportant local rumour spreading in Vinnytsia? Vinnytsia is not even one of the biggest

cities of Ukraine... Why is there a whole section about a demonstration with 2.000 people? Please note that WP:NOT.

Wikipedia is not a diary of the life of Ukrainian political parties. Read wp:what Wikipedia is not. —  Yulia Romero  • Talk to me!  15:16, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Philanthropy?
A well known problem with Ukrainian politics is that political parties are involved with "Philanthropy". But in reality this is just the bribing of voters. Political parties are not for philanthropy, they are for fixing problems by making laws. —  Yulia Romero  • Talk to me!  15:23, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Party membership 200,000 while the biggest party in parliament has 500 to a thousand members?????
How can this party have 200,000 members while the biggest party in parliament (Servant of the People party) has 500 to a thousand members? Combine this with the fact that almost nobody (<1%) of Ukrainians are members of a political party and this 200,000 number is just bizarre..... See Political parties of Ukraine. —  Yulia Romero  • Talk to me!  16:01, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

This article is simply bizarre
The propaganda and slander in this article is simply hilarious. An advice to the person(s) do it: be more subtle, because it is hard to buy what you are saying.

The sidebar lists "Euroscepticism" as an ideology, while the description of the program says exactly the opposite. Irrelevant events and distant connections are mentioned in order to emphasize some alleged connection with Putin. The "Ukrainophobia" bit is beyond absurd, as much as all the partizan sources used to back this up.

It is extremely sad that people use what should be an informative encyclopedia as a political battleground. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.136.41.98 (talk) 02:51, 6 January 2022 (UTC)