Talk:Paul Wei

Accurate or not?
I'm not sure if the concensus at wikipedia is to take miraculous intervention/events 'factually' or with a pinch of salt, so I've put up an tag. -Hmib 03:58, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Of course its accurate. -- 216.165.243.123 (unsigned user), 05:39, 13 January 2006

You have thousands of pages left to label then because religion and religious figures are usually associted with the miraculous. You have quite a job ahead of you so keep on keeping on.

i agree with the above

When the article states how a voice spoke to him it seems POV of the religion, try something like he claimed, the church believes. I dunno BauerPower 01:11, 25 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The information was based upon historical church records. (written in Mandarin) --Jose77 04:15, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

This story should not be presented like actual fact; the documents cited are unreliable sources. Church records can't be used as reference; they have not been published and have not undergone scrutiny by real historians. And real history books present religious stories in the context that it is what the followers of a religion/sect believed occurred,but did not necessarily (and most probably in this case) happen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulio2008 (talk • contribs) 02:23, 9 September 2010 (UTC)


 * To the person(s) who tagged the article with the and  templates, please specify on this talk page which parts you are referring to. In this way, other users would be able to fix it more easily.
 * Thankyou. --Phillip J (talk) 22:08, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

POV
I feel that the POV of this article is problematic, aside from the source of the info being potentially dubious? The article should be rewritten in such a way as to indicate that Wei allegedly had some of these things happen, such as miracles et al. - Erin Andy (talk) 00:38, 4 December 2018 (UTC)