Talk:Pearl Harbor Survivors Association

Older comments
While I appreciate Abu badali's campaign to erase my contributions from Wikipedia, due to disputes over fair use policy, I think it's unreasonable to start randomly tagging pages that have no dog in that fight for deletion, simply because they were created/edited by a particular editor. Very, very childish, and not-Wikipedia like. Someone needs to justify why THIS article is a candidate for speedy deletion, if you ask me. Which policy does it violate? None. It's maybe a stub, but the last time I checked, "being a stub" does NOT automatically make an article a candidate for deletion. Jenolen 22:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Not only that, but a quick on-line search shows this organization easily meets Wikipedia's "notability" standards. (Try "Google News Search" for many articles about this organization and its works.) It's really frustrating to have to waste time justifying things like this, due to the actions of an editor with a grudge. Jenolen 22:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Agreed. --humblefool&reg; 04:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Agreed. User:Sebbeng 15:13, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Rewrite
I couldn't find this article in a search so I had created a whole new one (offline) to start the topic. I only found this previously created one when I tried to create my own. I'll be posting my new article in place of this one (nothing is left out). With all that said, why doesn't this article show up in a search for Pearl Harbor Survivors Association? MikeMullins 02:21, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * It shows up in the searches now. MikeMullins 02:35, 1 December 2006 (UTC)