Talk:Pedra Branca dispute/GA1

GA review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * Comment: According to "Lead section", an article with more than 30,000 characters should have a lead section that is about three to four paragraphs long. However, given the content of this article, I think five paragraphs is not excessive. I've removed some text and added a sentence at the end with information from the "Reactions" section. — JackLee, 17:30, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * Fixed: No, it doesn't. I've added a reference. — JackLee, 17:30, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Fixed: I've reduced the size of the image and the resolution from 96 to 72 pixels per inch. — JackLee, 17:30, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Fixed: I've reduced the size of the image and the resolution from 96 to 72 pixels per inch. — JackLee, 17:30, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * Thanks for taking the time to review the article. I'm currently out of my home country and didn't have Internet access over the weekend, but managed to work on the aspects of the article today. Will be back home on Wednesday, 17 December. I think the article is ready for your further review. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 17:30, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I am please to promote this article to GA status.&mdash;RJH (talk) 17:45, 15 December 2008 (UTC)