Talk:Peru and the World Bank

[Untitled]
1. I thought that you had a very clear introduction and a lead section that gave strong background information. 2. It was organized, but try adding a content box. 3. Maybe add a little bit of information detailing the current projects and the outcomes of those projects. 4. I liked that you explained the positives and negatives of the World Bank. 5. You should add references and cite your sources.

1. Lead Section: Could include an introductory paragraph before the summary. With the most major points included.

2. Clear Structure: May want to add a photo and a content bar, in order to freshen up the page and make it more accessible.

3. Balanced Coverage: Could include information on the history between Peru and the World Bank. It would balance the Wikipedia page out.

4. Neutral Content: Your formatting of the content appears to be neutral, your used language is objective.

5. Reliable Source: Don't forget to include all the resources used, as well as links to other Wikipedia pages, that would help the understanding the topic better.

Discipulus1001 (talk) 21:36, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

1. I believe back ground was very well explained but deserves a bit more comparison since you mention its a top growing latin american country. Deserves a statistical comparison perhaps with other latin american countries to show us what you mean. 2. Very well put structures and headings, add more pictures and make page prettier. 3. More historical information would provide better context for your page. 4. Very objective content and sources seem to be reliable and especially because you used Peruvian sources as well. 5. Sources are fine, make sure to use them more and given more information from each one to be more content distributed

--BrunoAnteroBrasileiro (talk) 22:10, 5 December 2019 (UTC)BrunoAnteroBrasileiro