Talk:Photoelectrochemical process

Absorption (chemistry)
This should have its own page, since it's a non sequitur on the photoelectrochemical page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.20.39.28 (talk) 03:50, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Section moved to Sorption page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nimblecymbal (talk • contribs) 04:50, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Oh look at this randomly merged page ...
Whether pages should be merged or remain independent DOES NOT depend on whether it is a popular word in current research and applications. Why a physical phenomenon (such as photoexcitation) is included in an article on a specific chemical interaction like this? I'm a chemistry student, I can't stand it; this is not the way chemists or physicists write Wikipedia. I protest. SzMithrandir (talk) 23:02, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

So I'm creating "photoexcitation" right now.

Plagiarized content
This seems to be lifted verbatim from an Encyclopaedia Britannica article (which is helpfully listed as reference 10). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.79.36.249 (talk) 11:17, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

y of the article that seems unlikely. Do you mean a section? Please clarify which section? V8rik (talk) 21:06, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The entire article? Looking at the histor

No, not the entire article. The section on the Stark-Einstein law, that is, the section containig the reference I mentioned.