User talk:V8rik

24.215.95.182 (talk) 19:12, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Allyl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grignard. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Kinugasa reaction.png missing atom in reactant
The terminal alkyne in the first structure ends with just an explicit "C". Should it should have an explicit H (as a neutral organic reactant prior to reaction with CuI), or else a Cu bonded to it (the 3+2 reaction is of the copper acetylide)? DMacks (talk) 20:10, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I have made a change. Does not look pretty but it is effective. The peer-review time for images apparently is 9 years but I do not carry around the raw files for that length of time V8rik (talk) 20:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Looks good enough, thanks. I rarely save mine either. DMacks (talk) 21:26, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Organozinc compound, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reaction. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phagraphene, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kcal and Mol. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

NiOOH
This note is about a set of articles that you created. They are being reorganized because I am fairly sure that all oxidized nickel oxides are really NiOOH, including nickel peroxide. I am not 100% certain, but the inorganic aspects are very specialized. The important thing which we need to flesh out is that somehow these things are related to batteries. In any case content was not lost. I hope you are going to continue to edit around here, BTW. --Smokefoot (talk) 18:51, 29 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi Smokefoot, your edits make sense to me, keep up the good work! V8rik (talk) 16:24, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pyramidal carbocation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Apical. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

MILS series
Please look at Articles for deletion/Metal Ions in Life Sciences and comment if you wish. Petergans (talk) 20:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Uvitic acid
Hi there!

I have noticed your interest in the chemistry-related articles. I have recently created Uvitic acid, and need both professional and peer reviews as I am not than proficient with the subject of chemistry.

Cheerz! Lamro (talk) 16:04, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Correlation diagram listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Correlation diagram. Since you had some involvement with the Correlation diagram redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. DMacks (talk) 16:13, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Ann. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ann.. Since you had some involvement with the Ann. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nev&eacute;–selbert 02:21, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Reference errors on 31 January
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * On the Pentazole page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=762965945 your edit] caused an unsupported parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F762965945%7CPentazole%5D%5D Ask for help])

Replaced reference in Perovkite solar cells
Hi. I have replaced the Collavini reference for a more recent, interesting and accurate secondary source reference from Kamat.

I have seen that you included Collavini reference for first time and I would like to know that my change is ok for you.

ps: It was my first edition in Wikipedia. I will continue reviewing this entry about Perovskite solar cells. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Perovskitor (talk • contribs) 08:46, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi Perovskitor, I would see no reason to remove the first citation and replace it with another. Add all the citations you think are relevant but add them to the existing ones V8rik (talk) 19:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi V8rik,

I roughly estimate around 200 reviews in perovskite solar cell topic published currently in traditional scientific journals. Some of them dealing with more specific issues, another ones (majority) covering general aspects. I was wondering why specifically such 2-pages review was opening the wikipedia article on perovskite solar cells. It is not wrong of course, but it is lightly outdated and cover a very specific issue on perovskite solar cells as the (no) excitonic nature of this light harvester. In my opinion, there is 199 better review references to introduce perovskite solar cells to general audience or scientists looking for information about it. I personally have chosen the Kamat's review because probably it was the last one that I read and summarizes well the current trends of the topic in 56 pages.

However, you are right. Who am I to remove references here? I decided to put back the reference in a more useful place related to the specific issue that they are covering in the review. Perovskitor (talk) 15:59, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your consideration! V8rik (talk) 17:44, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

You may be interested in this
Notifying you, since you've made a lot of edits to the article. Banedon (talk) 07:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hydrophosphination, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unsaturated. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Chemical diagram mistake
On File:Fenestranes.png, the middle diagram is missing a second H on each corner. DMacks (talk) 01:05, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * grrrrr, a replacement is in the making... V8rik (talk) 17:35, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Fixed V8rik (talk) 09:46, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks (belatedly...forgot to watchlist this)! DMacks (talk) 02:29, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Help Requests
Hi! Attention is drawn to bond-dissociation_energy as once you had posted there. Bkpsusmitaa (talk) 02:31, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Reflist|4
Hi. Just letting you know that reflist|2/3/4 are all deprecated per Template:Reflist. If you don't know the best ways to format these are:
 * reflist|35em for 2 columns
 * reflist|30em for 3 columns
 * reflist|40em for 4 columns

Most of the time, 4 columns don't really need to be used unless an article has well over 200 or so refs. thanks --Jennica ✿ / talk 10:18, 23 April 2017 (UTC)


 * got it! V8rik (talk) 15:15, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

File:3-Quinuclidinone hydrochloride.svg
Hi... I think you originally uploaded the File:3-Quinuclidinone hydrochloride.svg. In the synthesis, there is a formula for what I think is meant to be potassium ethoxide, and if it is, it is missing a hydrogen atom (ie. instead of ). Are you willing and able to upload a corrected version? Thanks. EdChem (talk) 08:43, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Done! V8rik (talk) 10:02, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

propene - HBr reaction not balanced
In the reaction shown in MarkovnikovRulePropeneHBr.svg, there should be 2 propene and 2 HBr molecules to balance the equation.
 * Good catch! A replacement is underway. V8rik (talk) 17:14, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Updating the Saponification diagram
Hi there. I saw the that you did, and I was wondering if it is possible for a remake of this diagram by replacing the English word "Heat" with the more universal symbol for it, Δ...it would save a lot on translation compatibility for other language Wikis that might use this diagram.

Sincerely,

Anumengelamun (talk) 07:43, 8 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Hello, I have just made the change that you suggested. I hope it's ok for V8rik. --Hbf878 (talk) 21:05, 11 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks for making the change! V8rik (talk) 19:15, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks man! Means a lot to me. Have a great weekend! V8rik (talk) 18:37, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Fullerenes in popular culture for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fullerenes in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fullerenes in popular culture& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Bilorv(c)(talk) 00:24, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Molecular spacer


The article Molecular spacer has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unable to find evidence that this is a real term of significance."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — swpb T go beyond 14:55, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

CramruleOfAsymmetricInduction.png
Hi! I just wanted to point out that on the, the Fischer projections 2a and 2b show the wrong enantiomers. Please flip the positions of "H" and "Ph" in all streogenic centers. Thanks!

Discussion at c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:PentaceneSynthesis.png
You are invited to join the discussion at c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:PentaceneSynthesis.png. Ron h jones (Talk) 20:52, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

"Iron, pentacarbonyl-" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Iron, pentacarbonyl-. Since you had some involvement with the Iron, pentacarbonyl- redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 06:17, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Vitamin B12 total synthesis: MAJOR revision
Dear v8rik,

at long last I was able to finish my revision of your Vitamin B12 article - I just uploaded it. The long delay is due to the fact that I found it necessary to re-read most publications (and a lot of ETH theses) in order to provide precise citations for verification.

Given the length and complexity of this article, my "unusual" application of Show/Hide, and the number of sources and citations, I deemed it essential to comment on this in the talk page.

Best regards, Bert Easyloc (talk) 20:12, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi Bert,

Extensive amount of work done! Congratulations! I am going to review the new work, I will leave comments not here but on the vitamin talkpage => Talk

Rik

Image discussion
commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:TwistedAcene.png is one of your images. DMacks (talk) 13:37, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

"Fractional charge" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Fractional charge. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ComplexRational (talk) 15:06, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Chemical chirality in popular culture for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chemical chirality in popular culture, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Chemical chirality in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

"Molecular ion" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Molecular ion. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 22 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:59, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

File:EliminationReactionGlycerol2Acrolein2.svg


What does it mean in the image: "OS I:15"? Д.Ильин

"Neopentyl" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Neopentyl and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 27 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 23:46, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

"Aprotic solvent" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Aprotic solvent and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 6 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. CrafterNova (talk) 11:31, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

"Monomer(s)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Monomer(s) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 25 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:09, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

"Silane, (4-aminobutyl)diethoxymethyl-" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Silane, (4-aminobutyl)diethoxymethyl- and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:51, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

"Dichloromethylphenylsilane" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Dichloromethylphenylsilane and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:14, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

"Deoxofluorinating agent" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Deoxofluorinating_agent&redirect=no Deoxofluorinating agent] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Mdewman6 (talk) 23:39, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

"Gryszkiewicz-Trochimowski and McCombie method" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gryszkiewicz-Trochimowski_and_McCombie_method&redirect=no Gryszkiewicz-Trochimowski and McCombie method] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Mdewman6 (talk) 23:48, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cyanimide


The article Cyanimide has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Cannot find a consistent attestation to this term, which seems to vary in meaning across the literature."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 11:09, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Cyanimide for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cyanimide is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cyanimide until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. –Laundry</b><b style="color:#fb0">Pizza</b><b style="color:#b00">03</b> ( d c̄ ) 21:58, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

"Clinistrip" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Clinistrip&redirect=no Clinistrip] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:14, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Chirotechnology for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chirotechnology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chirotechnology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Ldm1954 (talk) 21:00, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Methanol economy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Methanol economy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Methanol economy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Chidgk1 (talk) 11:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC)