Talk:Pigeon guillemot

To do

 * Fix bare url refs. RileyBugz Yell at me  &#124; Edits  17:02, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Better source and clean up distribution section. RileyBugz Yell at me  &#124; Edits  23:34, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Sourcing done, clean up and expansion started. RileyBugz Yell at me  &#124; Edits  19:27, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Better source and expand start of behaviour section. RileyBugz Yell at me  &#124; Edits  23:34, 22 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Expand status section. RileyBugz Yell at me  &#124; Edits  23:34, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Done RileyBugz Yell at me  &#124; Edits  22:20, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

References to incorporate
Potential refs:
 * Taxonomy and systematics


 * Feeding

Feel free to add more here, but please organize them by section. RileyBugz Yell at me &#124; Edits  06:58, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Pre- GAN/FAC
Some points to discuss prior to sending this off: Sabine's Sunbird  talk  21:10, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The pigeon guillemot and the black guillemot form a superspecies.[4] - Surely this is contradicted by the preceding sentence - if anything it should form a superspecies with the spectacled guillemot? Similar issue in the lead. I would suggest taking out references to sister species or super species.
 * I would disagree—a sister species is a phylogenetic classification while a superspecies is a classification based on appearance. RileyBugz 会話 投稿記録  23:03, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Okay, yes, I see it now. Sabine's Sunbird  talk  23:31, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

On to FAC
Thanks to Funkmonk for the GAN review. Two things to resolve before FAC.
 * When creating the cladogram for the GAN I noticed the following paper which will need to be mentioned
 * Smith, N.A. (2011). "Taxonomic revision and phylogenetic analysis of the flightless Mancallinae (Aves, Pan-Alcidae)". ZooKeys. 91: 1–116.


 * Creating a range map. I was going to base it off the HBW - but their map has a massively expanded winter range at sea which contradicts the written sources. Sabine's Sunbird  talk  22:28, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Also why is Pallas, 1811 in parentheses? Surely that's only done when the species is renamed to denote the original author, and this species has not changed. Unless there is another reason to do it? Sabine's Sunbird  talk  00:38, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't know of another reason; I'll remove the parentheses. RileyBugz <sup style="color:#D7000B;">会話 <sub style="color:#D7000B;">投稿記録  00:40, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

'deadly'
The use of the word 'deadly' twice in this article, attributed to IUCN, seems to be a typo. The description of that status does not signify 'deadly'. IUCN describes this bird as of 'least concern', as stable. 2601:602:80:5FA0:CC:FE0:40AE:B8A9 (talk) 15:20, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * it was vandalism. (CC) Tb hotch ™ 17:31, 23 April 2021 (UTC)