Talk:Politics of Abkhazia

de jure
"de jure" or "de facto" ? I say to have only the official one which is in this case only "de jure" version. Georgianis |  (t) 17:10, 15 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Both. &mdash; Khoikhoi 17:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)


 * There is significant de facto side, with separatist wing. Its part of politics of Abkhazia, just like Armenian in Karabakh, Russians in Transmestiya, Chechens in Chechnya and so on. Ldingley 17:18, 15 August 2006 (UTC)


 * "Partially Recognised" has to be used, as it is used for Taiwan, Karabagh is not the same. And Ldingley word "seperatist" is wrong and fascist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.236.50.123 (talk) 16:19, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Care to find a partially recognized in Politics of Kosovo article. Looks like double standards to me.FeelSunny (talk) 21:31, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

"de facto seperatist"
The combined use of these two terms is unneeded imho. Either will do, now it sounds as though de facto applies to 'seperatist' rather than whatever is following the terms.

Then we must also use de facto inhuman for tbilisi politics.

Important notice
The government section of the "Outline of Abkhazia" needs to be checked, corrected, and completed -- especially the subsections for the government branches.

When the country outlines were created, temporary data (that matched most of the countries but not all) was used to speed up the process. Those countries for which the temporary data does not match must be replaced with the correct information.

Please check that this country's outline is not in error.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact The Transhumanist.

Thank you.

Branch
"Executive branch of the de facto separatist government" is incorrect. It's not that the government is "de facto separatist" – that it's to be considered "separatist" is objective. It's the independence that's de facto. Actually, it's now beyond that, because they are now already recognized by two countries. PasswordUsername (talk) 11:30, 28 June 2009 (UTC)