Talk:Power10

Reads like a press release
This entire article reads like a press release by IBM, for a product that's not even on the market yet.

Comparative figures (such as "AI inference workloads have a 20-fold performance increase") are given without specifying what they're comparing against, clearly with the intention to be "impressive" and attention-grabbing, and run contrary to WP:NPOV. Comparisons with previous generations should not be the focal (opening) statements; rather, the figures should be relegated to a "history" section, perhaps with a tabular comparison over multiple generations.

The comment about having only 15 cores seems to miss the point; the cores haven't already failed, because they haven't even been manufactured yet. Rather, this is forward planning for redundancy during manufacture, guaranteeing at least 15 cores will be available to the customer.

I suggest that this article be embargoed until the product is on the market, when its claims can be tested against actual devices. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martin Kealey (talk • contribs) 11:23, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

POWER10 → Power10
This page needs a name change. -- Henriok (talk) 09:38, 9 September 2021 (UTC)