Talk:Powers & Perils

The article reads like the author's personal reminiscence of the game, and not like an encyclopedia article. It's not exactly POV, but it needs relevant sourced statements instead of the vague and subjective language currently used. 71.204.204.249 09:30, 1 August 2007 (UTC)


 * My favorite line: "It may seem complicated, but once past the learning curve the system results in greater responsiveness and potential for character growth than any other modern role-playing game."  As someone who has seen this chart and formula laden piece of garbage, I can only respond with crazed laughter.  This is basically a propaganda piece.  75.164.188.100 (talk) 06:38, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Excellent game! The death of Powers and Perils has a seen a sharp decline of RPG's into oversimplified, unrealistic and unworthy dribble."It may seem complicated, but once past the learning curve the system results in greater responsiveness and potential for character growth than any other modern role-playing game." Definately an accurate description of the game system. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.10.5.143 (talk) 09:38, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

This has been sitting here with maintenance tags for ages, and a lot of it is more like a personal review than an encyclopaedia article. I've removed a large chunk of opinion/OR that seems unlikely ever to satisfy WP:V/WP:OR. (The remainder of the article also needs citing, but at least there might be cites for that stuff.)

Comments on a game's merits, strengths, etc, and assertions of their uniqueness, need to be cited to a notable source. --GenericBob (talk) 00:11, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Tower of the Dead into Powers & Perils
Insufficient content to justify separate articles. User:力 (power~enwiki, π,  ν ) 23:28, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: I don't believe a merge is necessary, but I will see what other sources I can come up with for it in the meantime. BOZ (talk) 13:14, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Support merge, on grounds of both short text and context. There also doesn't appear to be significant chance of expansion, so consolidation onto one page seems sensible. Klbrain (talk) 12:49, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ Klbrain (talk) 00:47, 31 August 2022 (UTC)