Talk:Project Monterey

This page seems to contain inaccurate and biased information. In particular, the statement "SCO left the Unix business in 2001" is misleading as both SCO OpenServer and UnixWare continue to be widely sold and used in 2008. What happened was The Santa Cruz Operation sold the Unix Server and Services divisions to Caldera. The agreements and contracts related to the Unix business were also transferred.

Further, statements like "Their claim appears to be that IBM started Monterey as a sham, intending all along to fool SCO into providing code to IBM which they intended to put into Linux, with no intention of ever releasing Monterey itself. This claim appears to be specious" are biased and simply reflect the opinion of the author without citation. This is mere speculation on the part of the author and a reference to Groklaw where more speculation is available.

These paragraphs need to be rewritten in an objective, neutral, and verifiable manner.

Ronald Joe Record (talk) 03:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Cleaned up that section and removed the editorial content. It is covered more completely on SCO-Linux_controversies. I'm not sure if Monterey had anything directly to do with the SCO-IBM lawsuit, although it is widely ascribed as a motive for SCO. 71.134.252.36 (talk) 05:09, 20 August 2008 (UTC)