Talk:Purnell School

Orphaned references in Purnell School
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Purnell School's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "NCES": From Oak Knoll School of the Holy Child: Oak Knoll School of the Holy Child, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed July 29, 2008. From Dwight-Englewood School: Dwight-Englewood School, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed July 21, 2008. From Mount Saint Dominic Academy: Maple Shade High School, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed April 7, 2008. From Stuart Country Day School: Stuart Country Day School, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed August 19, 2008. From Moorestown Friends School: Moorestown Friends School, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed August 21, 2008. From Community High School (Teaneck, New Jersey): Community High School, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed July 29, 2008. From Academy of St. Elizabeth: Academy of St. Elizabeth, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed September 20, 2008. From Mount St. Mary Academy: Mount St. Mary Academy, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed August 27, 2008.</li> <li>From Hun School of Princeton: Data for the Hun School of Princeton, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed June 12, 2007.</li> <li>From Princeton Day School: Princeton Day School, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed July 26, 2008.</li> <li>From The Hudson School: The Hudson School, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed August 27, 2008.</li> <li>From Blair Academy: Blair Academy, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed August 19, 2008.</li> <li>From Delbarton School: Delbarton School, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed April 7, 2008.</li> <li>From Monmouth Academy: Monmouth Academy, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed July 21, 2008.</li> <li>From Gill St. Bernard's School: Maple Shade High School, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed April 7, 2008.</li> <li>From Villa Victoria Academy: Data for Villa Victoria Academy, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed August 19, 2008.</li> <li>From Oratory Preparatory School: Oratory Preparatory School, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed May 17, 2008.</li> <li>From Saint Benedict's Preparatory School: St Benedict's Prep School, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed June 18, 2008.</li> <li>From Academy Charter High School: Academy Charter High School, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed March 12, 2008.</li> <li>From Saint Dominic Academy: Saint Dominic Academy, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed August 18, 2008.</li> <li>From Saddle River Day School: Saddle River Day School, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed April 16, 2008.</li> <li>From Montclair Kimberley Academy: Montclair Kimberley Academy, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed July 11, 2008.</li> <li>From Pingry School: Pingry School, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed August 27, 2008.</li> </ul>

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:17, 24 June 2009 (UTC)


 * The above is absolute nonsense. I can't imagine what the BOT or its creator is attempting to accomplish. Whatever it was it didn't work... Stevenmitchell (talk) 11:02, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Editorial Deletions
Several years ago, an editor/administrator (who shall remain nameless) made changes (deletions) to the article without much thought given to the 2-5-minutes of thought that their erasure might have applied. It was an entirely disruptive edit. More than half of the article was abjectly deleted (without any reconstruction) which, in its current format, leaves most of what is left, incomprehensible and entirely out of context. If someone has the time to fix the damage by reading what existed prior to 2012, with, of course, some brevity, (to avoid the outrage and revenge of the returning administrator/editor) the uniqueness of the subject may be able to be restored. But to do so, would require some time given to how more succinctly describe the history of the school's origin, without the extensive wording that was originally given the article. It is a unique secondary school, and it was designed to be that way, so a reconstructed explanation of its uniqueness is valid in Wikipedia; although now, in the article's current condition, that would be very difficult to discern. Regards... Stevenmitchell (talk) 11:12, 9 June 2017 (UTC)