Talk:Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan

Notability
is there anything all that notable about this firm?--Alhutch 22:38, 28 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Don't know--there are no references, and passages that are original research. 99.149.84.135 (talk) 22:19, 4 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Quinn Emanuel is pretty well known, and the fact that they are adverse to banks is pretty unusual. But the tone and neutrality of the article needs some serious cleanup!  Verkhovensky (talk) 02:07, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Hang on for speedy deletion
This page does not have a neutral point of view. Needs revision. I will rewrite it to discuss encyclopedic facts versus opinions & include outside sources. --Snowy213 (talk) 22:27, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree. Needs revision. Will contribute.Nimaneems (talk) 23:11, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110708133601/http://www.chambers-associate.com/FirmFeature/65258-2 to http://www.chambers-associate.com/FirmFeature/65258-2
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120402185625/http://www.vault.com/wps/portal/usa/companies/rankings/Quinn-Emanuel-Urquhart-&-Sullivan--LLP?companyId=10361 to http://www.vault.com/wps/portal/usa/companies/rankings/Quinn-Emanuel-Urquhart-&-Sullivan--LLP?companyId=10361
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140714030408/http://prague.usembassy.gov/ambassador.html to http://prague.usembassy.gov/ambassador.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:27, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

COI Editing
Edit made from Quinn Los Angeles office. The article contains repetitive instances of COI and puffery. Would benefit from revision.