Talk:Ramism

=What *is* it?= No clear, concise definition of Ramism anywhere in the article. Presumes (and requires) prior knowledge of the subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.247.247.0 (talk) 03:06, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

=John Rainolds= Although he was sympathetic toward Ramus for religious reasons, Rainolds was not a representative English Ramist. In fact, he gave lectures on Aristotelian rhetoric and dialectic and viewed those subjects quite differently than did Ramus. -- Chironomia (talk) 07:40, 10 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, he's now mentioned in the "Opposition" section, as in two minds. Charles Matthews (talk) 08:52, 11 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I read that. That section is really taking shape. -- Chironomia (talk) 13:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

tense
I really didn't read into this too much, but shouldn't the lede begin "Ramism is a collection of theories..."? —  pd_THOR  undefined | 02:33, 22 November 2008 (UTC)


 * No more Ramists post-1650, really. Charles Matthews (talk) 22:52, 24 November 2008 (UTC)