Talk:Redmine

WTF is up with the deletion recommendation. Redmine is one of the few FOSS options with provide integrated project management features, issue tracking, and support for multiple version control options. Sure, the article is sort of stub like in that it doesn't provide much in the way of depth or references, but that is no excuse for labeling it as an advertisement like plug of no importance. The niche it fills is quite important, and there are not many options within that niche. Furthermore, Hatter87 has created/edited content in other areas that demonstrates an appearance of conflict of interest and lack of objectivity in this area. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Correctivist (talk • contribs) 17:34, 26 June 2009‎
 * I suggest adding some more content and refs to the article to remove the concern. The available content from significant sources is a way to make notability clear.  Perhaps some from Redmine Cookbook, Redmine Complete Guide, and articles like the Medium piece, Redmine tutorial, comparisons, etcetera.  Cheers Markbassett (talk) 18:56, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The two books might help. The "What’s new" is a press release and will not, as is the case for the other two. WP:GNG is the guide. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:08, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Let me clarify: User:Correctivist - for your concern... here are some books, a piece in Medium, by Slashdot, and a tutorial that can help add content and refs.  Saying the importance of the product in TALK and of the article being stub like and of AfD or tags being wrong can be better addressed by edits to improve the article than by saying it here.  (Or by saying it at AfD.) Here were 5 items you might like, feel free to put in your faves or whatever subtopics you prefer.   Cheers Markbassett (talk) 11:26, 23 August 2021 (UTC)