Talk:Rexel

The section Business Practice and Treatment of Employees
I don't doubt that this section is more or less factual, but the language has major POV issues. Some references would also be nice - at the moment, it just sounds like some unreferenced musings by disgruntled ex-employees -- Ferkelparade &pi; 21:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

apparent contradiction
"The company refocused its business on the distribution of electrical supplies. In effect, it had sold most of its professional electrical distribution business in 1988 and in 1994 sold its subsidiary GDFI, the leading French distributor of industrial supplies." How can it have retained its core business of the distribution of electrical supplies if it both sold its electrical distribution business and sold its subsidiary that was the leading distributor of industrial supplies?

Is the meaning that it sold the business of distributing electrical power, as distinct from electrical supplies, and also sold its subsidiary that distributed general industrial supplies, restricting itself to the distribuion of equipment and other tangible products for electrical uses in industry? ` DGG ( talk ) 00:19, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Outdated logo
It seems like the company's logo should be updated with this one: http://www.rexel.com/content/uploads/sites/2/2016/01/rexel_logo_EN.jpg as seen on http://www.rexel.com/en/. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.150.16.164 (talk) 13:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)