Talk:Rivka Carmi

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 21:12, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Request edit on 5 June 2020
Please add in "Awards and recognition" 2019 - Honorary degree, Brandeis University, Massachusetts, USA. Source: https://in.bgu.ac.il/en/pages/news/rivka_brandeis.aspx --Zahira Cohen (talk) 20:50, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

✅ edit done, source is reliable.

Request edit on 6 January 2018
I declare that all of my editings were done from a neutral point of view and for the interest of the public, I followed Wikipedia's rules for paid editing. Thus, please delete the COI tag.

Please update the following paragraph: In November 2017, the Search Committee for the President of the University recommended extending Prof. Carmi's tenure as president by two additional years, through May 2020, since no other acceptable candidate had been found. In response, the academic senate held an extra-ordinary meeting, in which it declared that the search committee failed and called for the resignation of the chair of the executive committee, Mr. Asher Heled. [5] In a letter sent to university faculty members, Prof. Rivka Carmi referred, for the first time, to a protest against the extension: "At the end though, what I have in mind is the benefit of the university. Whenever the committee will find a replacement I will be the first to bless and to open the door for him." and cite this for the citation in the last sentence: https://www.haaretz.co.il/news/education/.premium-1.5578715. https://glz.co.il/גלצ/תוכניות/מה-בוער/מה-בוער03-01-2018-0902. Zahira Cohen (talk) 08:15, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * and please add a radio interview to the external links, in which Rivka discusses the extension of her tenure, 3 January 2018.


 * I'd like to implement this request, but since is the editor who most recently added infomation on this same topic to the article, I feel that their input on these newer elements — the radio interview and the statement — is important. So I'm going to wait a bit on this.   Spintendo  ᔦᔭ   11:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Someone independent needs to fully review this article before removal of the tag. Spintendo if you wish to add the suggestion feel free.
 * Zahira it is strongly recommended that you suggest changes on talk pages only. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 11:28, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Reply
✅ Suggestions implemented As far as the maintenance templates are concerned, these were advised as needing an "independent editor" to make the change. Despite both of us being independent editors, neither myself nor feel comfortable removing it on our own. Thus the template's removal, for now, awaits an independent someone else. In other words, someone completely removed from the process who can look at it with fresh eyes, should decide.  Spintendo  ᔦᔭ   17:43, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Request edit on 24 January 2018
Hi! I would like to change the picture to this updated picture of Carmi: File:Carmi 2015- updated photo.jpg

What can be done in order to delete the COI tag? Who can be invited to read and remove the tag? I am following the rules for paid editing Thank you in advance Zahira Cohen (talk) 09:23, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

✅  Spintendo  ᔦᔭ   09:57, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Request edit on 24 January 2018
Thank you very much for the editing so far. I would like to refine the translation I wrote. "What I have in mind is the good of the university, so once a person is elected to head it, I will be the first to congratulate, to vacate my place and to pave the way for anyone *who finds it suitable* - even if it is earlier than the two years that I was asked to fill: Please change the phrase in the asterisks to "who will be found suitable". Thanks! Zahira Cohen (talk) 01:25, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Reply
Corrected. The mistranslation of the 3rd person present verb "be" was Google's error (and mine for posting it) so the article has been corrected. Regards,  Spintendo  ᔦᔭ   02:51, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Request edit on 7 December 2018
Dear editors, It's been a year since I've asked to review this article so that the COI flag will be removed. I declared that all of my editings were done from a neutral point of view and for the interest of the public, I followed Wikipedia's rules for paid editing. Thus, please review this page and consider removing the COI tag. Zahira Cohen (talk) 09:32, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Reply 07-DEC-2018
There are several peculiarities in the article which gives other editors insight into what a heavily-COI edited article looks like. These include: These three items stand out as prime examples of COI editor-induced urban blight. This blight ultimately diminishes the article's overall encyclopedic tone. It is for these reasons that I believe the COI editor template should remain. The problems with this article are directly tied to this component, and other editors should be advised of it (through the use of the template) in order to effect any change upon it. Regards,  Spintendo   14:28, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) The subject's early life minutiae recounted in extraordinary (and irrelevant) detail (i.e., her father was a painter..)
 * 2) An inordinate number of bundled ref tags inappropriately placed as references for articles that are only mentioned because the article's subject co-wrote them (e.g., Author of over 150 publications in medical genetics, her research included the identification of 12 new genes[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]").
 * 3) An Honors section, with every listed item just as non-notable as the next