Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Rochester

Removed "Parishes" section
I took the liberty of removing the "parishes" section. The list was woefully incomplete, and a complete list would be ludicrously long and counterproductive for a wikipedia page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.170.241.160 (talk) 17:33, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

"Dioecesis Roffensis"
Anyone know the source for "Roffensis"? Aulus Sergius Sulla (talk) 00:55, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Aswering my own question: Aulus Sergius Sulla (talk) 01:50, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.dor.org/index.cfm/about-us/history/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Coat of Arms
The Arms section states (without any inline references) that the Coat of Arms was adopted in 1868 but was designed in the 1930s. How can something be adopted before it's designed? Can someone please explain this apparent time-warp. Truthanado (talk) 13:19, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , might have some insight on this, being the one who added the text to the article (without benefit of a source.) I can't find anything in the diocesan website's history archives about it. Elizium23 (talk) 13:48, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , the description/symbolism of the arms were taken from the description given for the left side of the Arms of Bishop Clark at the official website. (See Ecclesiastical_heraldry) I wrongly assumed that the coat of arms was adopted when the diocese was erected. After pointed out the discrepancy, I realize my mistake. It should have been adopted on or after 1930s. Unless a reliable source can be found I am removing the year adopted parameter (also added reference for description/symbolism). Wish you both a Happy New Year... --Jayarathina (talk) 17:12, 2 January 2021 (UTC)