Talk:Ross Stores

{{WPBS|1=

more info on this store chain.
It would be nice to show more info on this store chain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Caldorwards4 (talk • contribs)
 * Caldorwards4, please sign your comment with the [[Image:Button sig2.png]] and in the future, use the + button located next to the "edit this page" link located throught Wikipedia's discussion pages. Thank yo., This message has also been added to your user discussion page. --AOL Alex 01:43, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * According to the history that was 66.59.118.232 not me --Caldorwards4 02:44, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * My sincerest apologies, i'll be sure to check the changes next time. --AOL Alex 19:09, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

On the move

 * I'm moving the page to "Ross Stores, Inc." as "Dress for Less" is just the tagline. WizardDuck 01:02, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Somebody missed the comma and the capital I --Lukobe 00:27, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Rosslogo.PNG
Image:Rosslogo.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Do We Really Need This?
"Ross offers brand name clothing, footwear, bedding, furniture, fine jewelry, beauty products, and housewares. All merchandise is 20 - 60% below regular department and specialty store prices." That excerpt is from the history section. Seems really out of place. Should it be deleted? (This unsigned comment posted by user:Halladay, 1 August 2007 at )


 * This explains the descriptor " 'off-price' " in the lede, and I would like to restore it to the article, but you may be correct that it does not belong in the history section and I don't know if I can source it.  Note [2] cites the official Ross, Inc. FAQ, which don't cover Maybe a trade magazine article.  They have listed a phone # for other questions, but such a call I believe would fall under wp:OR.  rags (talk) 10:16, 3 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes, we need something like it. The 20% to 60% part comes across more like advertising, but the article should give a general idea of what they sell. "Department store" is extremely vague, and could describe a place like Sears where I can buy a washing machine, gym equipment, automotive tools, a television, mens' clothing, etc. The article does nothing to tell me what Ross really is. I know from TV ads that they sell women's clothing but have no idea whether I could buy a toaster or necktie there. There should be a general statement that covers the types of things that they sell, because if an article is about a store, and there's no indication of what the store sells, then the article says nothing about what the company does. Hagrinas (talk) 18:11, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Rosslogo.PNG
Image:Rosslogo.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:10, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Texas Supreme Court Case
Something of interest:
 * Ross Stores, Inc. v. Redken Laboratories 810 S.W.2d 741 (Tex 1991)
 * Mentioned in Distribution Law By Theodore L. Banks 1995 ISBN 0735502684
 * Redken filled a discovery request to learn how Ross was able to sell Redken products, since Ross was not a licensed Redken distributor, and its stores did not have professional beauticians or barbers, and it did not qualify as a resale outlet under Redken distribution agreements. Redken filed a motion for summary judgment arguing that the only what that Ross could have these products was through a distributor's beach of its contract.

Inclusionist (talk) 18:45, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Interesting. Was there ever an update to this? Benjamin (talk) 10:37, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved. DrKiernan (talk) 17:09, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Ross (company) → Ross Stores – This was moved from Ross Dress for Less to Ross (company). This was not a good move, seeing as the official company is named Ross Stores, Inc. Being that we don't include the "Inc." (et. al), this should be moved to Ross Stores. phøenixMøurning ( talk/contribs ) 01:48, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Support, as this seems to be the official company name.(mercurywoodrose)50.193.19.66 (talk) 20:30, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Founder
The founder of Ross is Stuart-Moldaw not Bill ikanson — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.82.107.20 (talk) 01:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Requested move 19 February 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Not moved per the WP:COMMONNAME arguments below. Calidum 02:46, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Ross Stores → Ross Dress for Less – * Official news sources like this use the full name.


 * Directories of shopping malls refer to the store as "Ross Dress for Less"


 * Their official website refers to the store as "Ross Dress for Less", as does their Official Facebook

Furthermore, the logo always uses the "dress for less" portion, suggesting that it is not a slogan but rather part of the official name. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:19, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Support We title articles on companies by the name they do business as, not by their official corporate name. For example, the article on Sam's Club is titled Sam's Club and not Sam's West, Inc. In addition, "Ross Dress for Less" is the common name. Crossover1370  (talk &#124; contribs) 05:45, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose: What the company itself and affiliated promotional sources and puff pieces call it are not so relevant. What do WP:independent reliable sources call it? Also, the proposed title is rather promotional in tone – it's more of a slogan than a straightforward proper name. Also, the logo has "Ross" in very large font size with "dress for less" in much smaller font, and the website name is "rossstores.com", and the company name in the footer of the website is "Ross Stores, Inc." Fortune and Bloomberg call it "Ross Stores", and so do the headlines of the company's own press releases. The independent non-promotional sources seem to favor the current title. —&#8288;&#8202;&#8288;BarrelProof (talk) 05:40, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose Common name of the brand is Ross (or Ross Stores). "Ross Dress for Less" is a marketing slogan. Natg 19 (talk) 00:43, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose. If anything, the WP:COMMONNAME is "Ross". See also Ngrams, in which "Ross Stores" has been significantly more common for most of its history. feminist🇺🇦 (talk) 04:26, 8 March 2022 (UTC)