Talk:Rudolf Bultmann

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Rudolf Bultmann. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070302235855/http://www.religion-online.org/showbook.asp?title=426 to http://www.religion-online.org/showbook.asp?title=426
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070302235855/http://www.religion-online.org/showbook.asp?title=426 to http://www.religion-online.org/showbook.asp?title=426
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060530060721/http://www.religion-online.org/showbook.asp?title=431 to http://www.religion-online.org/showbook.asp?title=431

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:45, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Controversy over solafidianism
This article could state that Bultmann was almost certainly the most controversial New Testament scholar of the twentieth century. It could also state that in Bultmann's view, historical knowledge was unnecessary for a religious understanding of the world, for his interpretation of the Lutheran doctrine of solafidianism said that justification was by faith, not by historical knowledge. Vorbee (talk) 21:02, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Theologian or New Testament Scholar
This article begins by describing Bultmann as a Lutheran theologian, but I once read that Bultmmann was a New Testament scholar rather than a theologian. The book in which I read this said that Bultmann was probably the greatest New Testament theologian of the twentieth century, and almost certainly the most controversial. Vorbee (talk) 07:54, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Dialectical theology, not liberal theology
I would take issue with the second sentence of the introduction to Bultmann. His orientation was dialectical theology, which was a reaction against liberal theology. So to describe him as an important liberal theologian is highly inaccurate and something he would object to.Giedt (talk) 19:58, 29 September 2018 (UTC)