Talk:Ruma Maida

Copy-edit
I've copy edited as requested. Very little needed changing, in my view. The longish sentence in the second para of the lead may trouble some reviewers at FAC, though it doesn't trouble me. Three queries:
 * In the lead "struggle to save a historic house, as well as the life of the house's original owner" is ambiguous: at first I took it to mean that she saved the original owner's life as well as the house. You need to make it clear that (i) the struggle to save the house and (ii) the story of the original owner are the two themes.
 * The relation between the text and the three notes seems to have gone awry: in the text the notes are indicated by letters (rather unusually) but the notes themselves have numbers not letters.
 * In the alt text for the wedding photos you say in "a Muslim manner", but in the text you refer to the wedding as in a church, rather than a mosque.

I don't think doing this light copy-edit disqualifies me from commenting at FAC, so please let me know when you nominate it, and I'll be glad to add my support. Tim riley (talk) 10:26, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

DVD release date
It came out on DVD before its premiere? If that's the case, wouldn't the DVD release be the premiere? Brutannica (talk) 15:56, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Good catch. That's supposed to be 2010. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:03, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

"Ruma", atau "Rumah"?
"Ruma", atau "Rumah"? Kotabatubara (talk) 17:31, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I withdraw my question. I see that "Ruma" accurately reflects the title of the film, and that the "ruma"/"rumah" question belongs in some other venue.  Terima kasih.  Kotabatubara (talk) 19:46, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * None of the sources explain why they went with the non-standard spelling. I've never seen it elsewhere. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:25, 28 October 2014 (UTC)