Talk:Run and shoot offense

Urban Meyer -- Not Run & Shoot?
Urban Meyer's system seems to put equal emphasis on run and pass. Tebow this year has 25+ passing TDs and 25+ rushing. Furthermore, it has as much in common with old single-wing philosophies (mis-direction, direct snap to primary runner who just happens to be a QB) as it does with Mouse Davis run & shoot. In short, I think it's a poor example. Clames (talk) 18:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Meyer has consistently throughout his career favored a 60/40 run/pass balance. Whoever made that comment has not followed Meyer's coaching style, so it will be deleted. Bantab 06:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Wrong philosophy regarding run and shoot
The article is lacking a/the primary concept behind the run and shoot. The central philosophy behind the run and shoot offense is not "pass to set up the run". It is for the quarterback to read how many defenders are inside the "box" i.e. how many defensive lineman and linebackers there are inside the area between (and inluding) the ends, and the area immediately behind the defensive line. If the quarterback sees 6 or less defenders in the box, a running play would be advantageous because of how the offensive line/backs match up with the defense. If the defense loads the box up with 7 or more defenders, a pass play will most likely result since the coverage would be relatively light or poreous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.218.97.136 (talk) 00:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Incorrect team listings
The 1990 and 1991 Indianapolis Colts were not run & shoot teams. They did use elements of that offense but their primary offense was not run & shoot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.185.187.209 (talk) 19:41, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:


 * http://cfl-scrapbook.no-ip.org/CFL-NBC.php
 * Triggered by  on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 20:26, 8 December 2013 (UTC)