Talk:Samsung Galaxy S20

Removal of "Leaks" Information
It seems that whoever decided to add the information given by leaks was in a real rush.

This is not how to write an article: "The phone will be included in a Pack (Samsung S20+ Samsung Buds : a lot of leaks say)The colors Available will be Cotton Candy, Waterfall, White , Jet Black , Navy Blue (Source : Leaks) The price is gonna vary into 1000-1200€ ,depends on the model (or bundle).The camera is supposed to be 8K 60fps video , 33mp Camera (4 of them on the back panel) and a 12 mp Selfie Camera. (Leakers Say) It will have the camera design as an iPhone 11 Pro but there won't be 3 , but 4 cameras! (Source : Leaks)"

I am removing this section for a few reasons:
 * 1) It has no sources. Use of parentheticals stating "Leaks say" is NOT a source.
 * 2) Terrible grammar. Whoever wrote this was in a real rush. "The price is gonna vary into 1000-1200€ ,depends on the model (or bundle).", as well as "but there won't be 3, but 4 cameras!" are both great examples of how NOT to write an article.
 * 3) Poor Structure. The sentences have plenty of unnecessary information. See "It will have the camera design as an iPhone 11" and "depends on the model".

Please do not write articles like this. There are many standards that go into writing a cohesive, proper article that accurately describes something.

This is not an example of that.

Maxmmyron (talk) 00:13, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Mention of Samsung Galaxy S11
Why was the "previously planned as Samsung Galaxy S11" part of the intro removed? I remember seeing it, and I think it still deserves to be there. Feel free to explain it to me if I'm wrong though. JdRDMS
 * There appears to be no reliable sources discussing the fact that Samsung planned the phone as the S11 but changed the name to the S20. Taewangkorea (talk) 02:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok, that makes sense. But how about something like "previously rumored as Samsung Galaxy S11" or something like that? Thanks for responding btw. JdRDMS — Preceding unsigned comment added by JdRDMS (talk • contribs) 20:14, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

S20 Ultra has 5x optical zoom, not 10x
The S20 has 3 cameras, ranging from the ultrawide at a 120 degree FOV, to the telephoto at 24 degrees. That is only a 5x difference. The 10x is "Hybrid Optic Zoom" which crops in the telephoto image. The FOV can be seen here on Samsung's specs page: https://www.samsung.com/global/galaxy/galaxy-s20/specs/ 104.193.169.74 (talk) 06:22, 21 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Probably some marketing buzzwords for digital zoom trickery. --84.147.34.137 (talk) 15:21, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Phablet?
The introductory line calls this phone a 'phablet'. While technically accurate, the phablet page itself says that the term has fallen out of use. Wouldn't it be better to refer to it as a "Flagship Smartphone" or something else?

24.163.44.110 (talk) 21:40, 26 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Agree, their size is fairly standard. Changed to the neutral term smartphone per previous Galaxy S articles. Karpouzi (talk) 14:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Smartphones have increased in size alot during the last few years. Does that affect the definition of “phablet”? --84.147.34.137 (talk) 15:19, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Error
Under the Connectivity section, the assertion was made that "However, only Verizon models are compatible with ultra-fast millimeter-wave networks". This is both incorrect, and not supported by the citation provided. AT&T models also support mmwave 5G - https://9to5google.com/2020/03/05/att-5g-mmwave-galaxy-s20/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.121.217.2 (talk) 20:18, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5g
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5g 223.187.60.231 (talk) 09:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC)