Talk:Sarah Milledge Nelson

Image
"These should still be decided on a case-by-case basis, based on an actual analysis rather than simply "they're bad"." you do not have a broad consensus, or policy basis, to remove images. please discuss before unilaterally removing reliable sourced content. --Turktimex3 (talk) 16:52, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * What "reliable sourced content" are you referring to here? The image you want to include does not have reliable sources. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:20, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * the image reliably illustrates the article subject, more so than the image in Plato. present an argument to remove the image other than "they're bad". --Turktimex3 (talk) 13:28, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * You've presented absolutely no evidence that the image reliably illustrates the article subject - either here, on the other pages where you've put forward this same argument, or in the noticeboard discussion you've been pointed to. If you believe that to be the case, the burden of demonstrating that falls on you. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:11, 4 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Turktimex3, the onus is on you, as multiple editors have objected. Several times I have directed you to the No Original Research board where there is an active discussion, yet you refuse to participate. If we ever have to escalate this matter to one of the behavioral boards, that isn't going to be a good look for you. Zaathras (talk) 14:16, 4 February 2023 (UTC)