Talk:ScoopWhoop

Removal of advertorial Tag
Hello Moderators, Can you please point out the sections which seem advertorial or promotional to you so that I can convert them to a more neutral point of view. Thank You. Blessedhuman111 (talk) 03:44, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * There aren't "Moderators" per se; every editor is a steward of content here. You are free to remove the issue template yourself if you feel article is not advertorial. The tagging editor provided no rationale in edit summary or Talk page. If there is disagreement on its removal (or inclusion), ideally, interested parties will come to this Talk page and explain their reasoning (WP:BRD). You are strongly encouraged to make any necessary improvements you see fit to the article. Be bold in your editing. So get in there and start editing! ;) Namaste. -- dsprc   [talk]  06:08, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Controversial content about allegations
Please discuss policy-based arguments about the inclusion (or exclusion) of this controversial content here. The mention is sourced, is of encyclopedic interest, and doesn't go into any unnecessary detail. However, the sentence could use a bit more relevant context (or an update, if newer information from reliable sources becomes available). In short, the current version may need additional tweaking but should be included in some form. GermanJoe (talk) 11:53, 14 September 2017 (UTC)