Talk:Scott H. Faulring

Untitled
I am sure I read a criticism of Faulring's readings in his edition of the Journals of Joseph Smith. However I can not seem to find it, and would have no objection to a rewording of the section to avoid that issue.

On the issue of the article written with Anderson, the fact that they attack Compton's notion of polyandry is without dispute.Johnpacklambert (talk) 03:30, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

removing POV template without ongoing discussion per Template:POV instructions
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
 * This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
 * There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
 * It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
 * In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 19:05, 25 June 2013 (UTC)