Talk:Scribe Mail

Notability
This program is clearly notable. It has a community of users with active forums, the author makes a significant income from registrations and it is regularly updated with feedback from active users. It also also appeared on other popular sites:

http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,130009-page,5-c,internet/article.html - comparison of email clients http://email.about.com/cs/winclientreviews/gr/scribe.htm - review

Scribe is clearly notable. Mojo-chan (talk) 14:51, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * By the definition determined by other people at Wikipedia, located at the notability guideline, I would say that this software is marginally notable. I see two very short reviews in reliable sources.  Ideally, information from these reviews needs to be incorporated into the article and the reviews need to be cited.  The problem is not a personal one.  People who tag articles as not botable enough for inclusion don't hate you.  They aren't out to get anyone.  They just aren't mind readers.  If you have sources which indicate notability, like the two you provide above, than a good idea is to put them into the article, so that in the future, other editors will not have to pretend that they exist.  They will know that they exist.  --Jayron32| talk | contribs  17:16, 11 December 2007 (UTC)