Talk:Segugio dell'Appennino

Piccolo Segugio dell'Appennino vs. Segugio dell'Appennino
I noticed that this article has been declared as a copy of Piccolo Lepraiolo Italiano. To tell the truth, this page seems to talk about the Piccolo Segugio dell'Appennino variety, despite the title. However, I maintained the change, and merged here some information originally contained in Piccolo Lepraiolo Italiano. Unfortunately, there is a little bit of confusion on the exact name of the three varieties. Greetings, --Mparu ∞ (msg) 18:42, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I am not a dog expert, but when I went to stub-sort the stub at Piccolo Lepraiolo Italiano I found that it started: "The Piccolo lepraiolo italiano or Segugio dell'Appennino ...". I checked "what links here" to see whether there was a redirect from the given alternative name of Segugio dell'Appennino and there wasn't, so I set off to create that redirect and found there was already a full article at that name, which did not mention the name "Piccolo lepraiolo italiano". So I turned the new stub into a redirect, and added the second name to this article. Sort it out for yourselves, but please remember to make redirects from alternative names, and to agree among yourselves which names are for the same breed and which are different! PamD (talk) 19:23, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I appreciated your change, I did not mind to criticise you. I am unfamiliar with redirects tools and with some templates, so I imagine that my stub could have been a little bit messy. For example, I suspect that there could be, somewhere, a page on the third variety of the breed, but I cannot find it. However, I wrote to you just to know if you agree with the little shift of meaning caused by the events in this page. In my opinion (but I am not an expert of this particular breed) the title and the text disagree (apart from the topic, what would you do under these circumstances?). I took for good the title, following your move. If you agree, for me it is all fixed; if you disagree I rename this article, then rollback my last merge here and your redirect in Piccolo Lepraiolo Italiano. Greetings, --Mparu ∞ (msg) 20:18, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Permission to use photos from Club Segugio dell'Appennino
@Annwfwn Hi, I got permission to use photos from https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100057201888792 after I messaged them on facebook.

Here is the conversation:

Me: ciao, sto lavorando a varie pagine wikipedia sui cani, attualmente il Segugio dell'Appennino non ha molte informazioni o una foto. Mi chiedevo se hai una foto che può essere utilizzata sulla pagina di wikipedia, in caso contrario va bene. Grazie! (scusa se suona strano, sto traducendo dall'inglese)

Club Segugio dell'Appennino: Salve, mi scusi ma eravamo in ferie e non abbiamo visto il messaggio! può utilizzare le foto degli album presenti sulla pagina! Grazie!

I'm just not really sure how to go about this, do I need to post proof of the conversation in some way? Idk how to pick a photo either. They said we can use the photos from the albums.

Sorry for bothering you with this. SpookMew (talk) 17:33, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 * , if they really want to release the photos for anyone, anywhere, to use however they wish, not excluding commercial publication, then these are the steps:
 * The copyright holder (almost always the photographer) uploads the original file(s) to Wikimedia Commons (follow this link)
 * the copyright holder or a representative completes a creative commons release following the steps here, and sends it by email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (the release generator will do most of that)
 * a VRT agent will sooner or later respond to the email, and may ask for additional details or proof of ownership of the image(s); if all is in order, the file(s) are annotated with the permission, and become available for use.
 * Please be aware that images taken from the internet are normally quickly deleted from Commons, and also that what somebody said in an email is not anywhere near being sufficient permission for the use of an image (this is to protect the rights of photographers, I believe). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)