Talk:Selina Meyer/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 11:36, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Nominator: TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD)

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have my full review up shortly. -- Seabuckthorn   ♥  11:36, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * See below for layout & words to watch issues (Fixed).
 * See below for layout & words to watch issues (Fixed).


 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * Pass
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * Pass
 * C. No original research:
 * Pass
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * Pass
 * B. Focused:
 * Pass
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Pass
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * Pass
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * Pass
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * Pass
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass.

WP:LAYOUT:


 * Fix section Personal life (MOS:PARAGRAPHS). The number of single-sentence paragraphs should be minimized. Short paragraphs and single sentences generally do not warrant their own subheading. Either this section should be merged into the previous section, or else more information on the character's personal life should be added.
 * Rearranged.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

WP:WTW:


 * Puffery (WP:PEA)
 * Use a different heading for section Critical acclaim. Many FAs on fictional characters refer to "Reception" or "Critical reception", which would be more neutral.
 * done.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:29, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Synonyms for said (WP:SAY)


 * Fix "Parker further notes that". What follows is his interpretation, so a verb like "assesses" or "opines".
 * O.K.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:31, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Fix "Laura Bennett of The New Republic notes". This is really an opinion.
 * Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:34, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

I'm putting the article on hold. All the best! -- Seabuckthorn   ♥  23:10, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

OK, everything looks good now. Passing the article to GA status. -- Seabuckthorn   ♥  11:49, 1 January 2014 (UTC)