Talk:Semantic HTML

Intro?
This is a talk page. Please respect the talk page guidelines, and remember to sign your posts by typing four tildes (112.215.36.144 (talk) 07:39, 20 April 2014 (UTC)).

Rewrite Suggested
The article doesn’t explain where semantics/meaning come from (agreement, essentially) and what different levels of agreement there are (standards, microformats, classes/IDs, &c.). Many conclusions of the article are consequentially false. Problems begin with the introductory statement that semantic HTML “reinforces semantics”; semantic HTML doesn’t reinforce semantics unless this is meant to say that oranges reinforce their being orange. Rich Snippets are probably a very, possibly too specific example, while RDF/Semantic Web could be good to elaborate on in the HTML realm. I don’t mean to bash here for there are some useful parts in the article, but overall I suggest a rewrite. (I’m merely suggesting, then, to rule out bias; I myself have explained semantics on my own site and at Google.—j9t (talk) 10:10, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Semantic HTML. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100104101244/http://dev.w3.org:80/html5/spec/text-level-semantics.html to http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/text-level-semantics.html#the-i-element
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100104101244/http://dev.w3.org:80/html5/spec/text-level-semantics.html to http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/text-level-semantics.html#the-b-element

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 03:15, 21 January 2016 (UTC)