Talk:Shaybanids

False edit summary
I find user:CamTalbot removal of referenced information under the edit summary, "Removed irrelevant information in order to better inform readers", is disingenuous. The information is clear and reliably sourced, showing the culture of the Shaybanids and is to better inform readers of their culture(ie. Persianate). Continued removal of referenced information will be considered disruptive editing and will be handled appropriately. --Kansas Bear (talk) 22:38, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Requested move 10 April 2019

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: No consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) DannyS712 (talk) 03:41, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Shaybanids → Abu'l-Khayrids – According to Encyclopædia Iranica, Shaybanids is an obsolete name for the dynasty that is now, and more correctly, referred to as Abu'l-Khayrids: "ABU’L-KHAYRIDS, the name used for the dynasty that ruled the khanate of Bukhara in 906-1007/1500-99. Until recently, this dynasty was incorrectly called in Western literature “Shaybanids” (or “Shibanids”)." KoberTalk 18:58, 10 April 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. samee  converse  23:22, 18 April 2019 (UTC)  --Relisting. --  Dane  talk  05:25, 27 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Support per Kober. --HistoryofIran (talk) 20:40, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose without a better rationale. The name is not obsolete at all. It remains more common than Abu'l-Khayrids. The argument in EI is not totally convincing. Srnec (talk) 02:32, 12 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Origin
Were they "Persianized Mongol" or "Persianized Turko-Mongol" like other Turko-Mongol khanates. There are many sources that calls them Turko-Mongol. Beshogur (talk) 09:50, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Unfairly deletation
I indicated the sources about the infos which I have added except the obvious ones like Bukhara Khanate(It is known ruled by shaybanids undoubtedly). But if you want sources for them as well, I will also add. Please stop deleting everything I write. Ultimete (talk) 21:15, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The 'sources' you added were not cited correctly and seemed non-WP:RS at best. --HistoryofIran (talk) 22:03, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
 * An infobox would be useful, but most of the info seems incorrect like Qasim khanate, and even Shaybanids in Khiva were replaced by 16th century by Manghuds, etc. Beshogur (talk) 23:44, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Erroneous Map Needs Removing or Edit
first of all, a map should not be placed for 1500c. but would make more sense if it showed 1400c.

Secondly, "Northern Yuan" did not exist at that time besides this and makes no sense why they appear on the map. 2603:7000:801:1143:F5FE:41D6:B687:FEAC (talk) 05:45, 29 September 2023 (UTC)