Talk:Sherman College of Chiropractic

Discussion moved from user talk page
I do want to promote Sherman College in its role of supporting straight chiropractic philosophy as opposed to mixed chiropractic. I am still editing the article. Whyzz (talk) 16:25, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Whyzz


 * That's not what wikipedia is about. This article breaches WP:SOAP andy (talk) 23:22, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Sherman College of Chiropractic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www.sherman.edu/alumnidirectory/Directory.aspx?userid=-1&mid=-1
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060927201154/http://www.knowitall.org/sandlapper/Autumn-2005/PDF/Healing.pdf to http://www.knowitall.org/sandlapper/Autumn-2005/PDF/Healing.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091127071218/http://www.sherman.edu/edu/news/archived_news/2009/archived_11_10_09_Sherman_College_Returns_to_Original_Name.html to http://www.sherman.edu/edu/news/archived_news/2009/archived_11_10_09_Sherman_College_Returns_to_Original_Name.html
 * Added tag to https://www.fastcase.com/Google/Start.aspx?C=d3199629c9d6087a57c0a23f4ac094f4d478666e58156959&D=cfaa34bcce09b38ab76422fea603244f470827d439cba13e
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090403083807/http://directory.fclb.org/Colleges/ChiropracticCollegesintheUnitedStates/tabid/126/Default.aspx to http://directory.fclb.org/Colleges/ChiropracticCollegesintheUnitedStates/tabid/126/Default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:30, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Removing COI tag
, I see you placed a COI tag on this page back in August of this year. Just wondering your reasoning. The article doesn't seem to have any bias, POV, or slant to it, it is pretty short and while it perhaps needs better referencing seems to be easy to find online information. Who were you suspecting to have a COI with this article? Did you leave a post on their talk page asking if they could declare a COI if it's true? For now I'm removing the tag because I just don't see how it fits, but let me know if I'm mistaken! S EMMENDINGER  ( talk ) 15:07, 2 November 2018 (UTC)