Talk:Sleepy's

Untitled
Please note that this page may be in violation of Wikipedia guidelines. See WP:COI & WP:SPAM. --Evb-wiki (talk) 22:10, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Bedbug Story is back

 * What do people think?--Milowent • hasspoken 21:20, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Bug with Sleepy's and Sleepy%27s
There is a bug with this page. If you're completely anonymous and hit:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleepy's

You will get an old revision. However, if you're completely anonymous and goto:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleepy%27s

You will see the current revision.

Once you login, you will not be able to reproduce this. Even if you log back out, and try to hit either of these URLs, you will see the current version. The issue probably exists at some caching level where http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleepy's is stale and is not getting cleared upon revision. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamchal (talk • contribs) 14:24, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

History
It seems the first and second paragraphs are covering the same ground. Perhaps they are cribbed form diferent sources. Much simplification is in order. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 09:06, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Somebody needs to add verifiable sources to support most of the claims in the history section. The company website is not an acceptable source...or is it?--PhiladelphiaInjustice (talk) 12:36, 30 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Most of this would seem to meet the standards at WP:SELFSOURCE. --Nat Gertler (talk)


 * I'll take your word for it. I did not bother to delete anything because I suspected that a company employee had entered it. Why would he lie?--PhiladelphiaInjustice (talk) 16:02, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Acquisition
Mattress Firm is buying Sleepy's. Once that deal closes (mid 2016), this article probably should be merged into Mattress Firm, along with all the other mattress companies they've acquired. John Nagle (talk) 20:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)


 * No, this article should remain intact and stand alone because Sleepy's has been a major national retailer for decades. That fact alone makes the article encyclopedia-worthy, even if the chain's name changes. Obviously, the article can be linked to the new owner's article after the alleged sale occurs.--PhiladelphiaInjustice (talk) 12:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

It should at least redirect with a clear explanation that the Mattress Firm has bought out the company. Here is the reason why: Sleepy's customers in 2016 or previous years will buy mattresses from Sleepy's and be unaware that they have a 10 or 20 year warranty with a company that no longer exists. Mattress Firm may not be legally required to honor these warranties, but the customers will need to know who to ask on this subject, especially since as of November 2016, Sleepy's has not gone public that they are going out of business. Their slogan still claims they are the only mattress professionals, which at this point is almost false advertising. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:14B:4401:D5C0:9028:75B3:CB5C:3F24 (talk) 15:42, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Sleepys taken over by Mattress Firm, taken over by Steinhoff International
A new section should be added to reflect Sleepy's shifting management. Sleepy's was purchased by Mattress Firm, and almost immediately Mattress Firm was bought out by what has been described as the African Ikea.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/steinhoff-to-buy-mattress-firm-for-2-4-billion-1470599217 http://www.cnbc.com/2016/08/07/steinhoff-buys-mattress-firm-in-cash-stock-deal-worth-nearly-4-billion.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:14B:4401:D5C0:9028:75B3:CB5C:3F24 (talk) 16:01, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Mattress brand
A recent edit changed the lead to talk about Sleepy's as a mattress brand. While that may well be the case (the change was unsourced), this article is about a chain of stores; there is no sign that the mattress brand has developed sufficient notability to have an article about itself. This is not to say that there can't be a small section below mentioning that the name is now being used for such a brand, but it should not be the introduction. I am reverting that change. --Nat Gertler (talk) 14:49, 17 February 2020 (UTC)