Talk:Stanley Krippner

Awards and honors
The standard for awards and honors in biographies of living persons is to list them as a section at the end of the article. See featured articles for numerous examples. Also only notable awards should be listed. If the awards are notable there will be some discussion of them in third party sources beyond the primary sources announcing the award. Most of the awards currently listed don't seem particularly notable and the sourcing is completely inadequate. - - MrBill3 (talk) 05:53, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Repeated removal of well sourced content in short time
The repeated removal of sourced content and section blanking is not appropriate. I have restored the content. Disruptive editing and edit warring are against policy. - - MrBill3 (talk) 03:07, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Adding in fringe material
These IPs and user (possibly all the same person) keep adding in fringe psychic sources and/or deliberately deleting reliable sources from the article.



I ask this person/s to please discuss this on the talk-page first. If this is continued then it is nothing more than disruptive vandalism and the article may have to be locked. If you have an issue please discuss it here so we can sort it. Thanks. Goblin Face (talk) 15:58, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Removal restored, content based only on primary sources removed
Substantial sourced content was removed with a misleading edit summary. I have restored. There was a substantial chunk of puffery based only on the primary sources for the content. If this information is notable it will have been covered by reliable secondary sources. If secondary sources report this content it can be restored when secondary sources are provided. - - MrBill3 (talk) 15:22, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

COI Censorship
There is clearly a campaign by one or more COI editors to censor this article. That campaign has reached the point where the editing is becoming disruptive. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:49, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Abusive language
The text quotes Gardner's "a pretty, plump, dark-eyed little charlatan". It is not clear to me in what way the adjectives add anything of value, so would it not be better were those frankly offensive words removed, so the article simply made reference to "a charlatan"? --Brian Josephson (talk) 18:52, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Colaboración libro
"El Retorno de los sabios" Coautor José Ignacio Carmona(2013)ISBN 9788494113314 83.56.51.142 (talk) 00:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)