Talk:Star Wars: The High Republic

Untitled
As creator of the SW: THR page I am making the talk page to facilitate communication about the topic. Snowboard0001 (talk) 08:22, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Separate pages for component works
Now that several reviews and news stories have been posted specific to the topics of Light of the Jedi (novel) and The High Republic (comic), it might be time to create separate articles for them. I think the amount of separate coverage meets Wikipedia's notability criteria. What do you guys think? --GimmeChoco44 (talk) 16:07, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Since there's no feedback, I'm going to start drafting these pages with sources for plot, characters, creation/development, and critical reception.--GimmeChoco44 (talk) 05:59, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Apologies for this late response, but I agree that there seems to be enough coverage to at the very least create separate articles for the Light of the Jedi novel. I would imagine that there is also enough coverage to support a separate article on The High Republic comics, but remember that there are two comics associated with this. One is published Marvel and the other by IDW. I think both could be seen as notable for their own article, but since I have never worked on comics articles, I cannot say with 100% certainty. Aoba47 (talk) 02:11, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks. New page for Light of the Jedi is up -- (plot can still use some work) -- Light of the Jedi (novel) --GimmeChoco44 (talk) 08:12, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Sortable Table?
Can someone please create a sortable table so sort by publication order and/or chronological order? See here for chronological order series 70.16.197.142 (talk) 14:37, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Source for Reception?
In the second paragraph for the Reception section there is a grammatical issue with quotation marks making it unclear where the quote ends and the editor's words begin. The source's link is broken but easily able to be accessed by messing with the url structure but needs to be fixed. The source is also not a first-hand source but an article citing a source from Circana Bookscan, should the source be changed to Circana Bookscan so the most up-to-date information can be gained? 2600:1700:8660:AA00:45C7:BB55:3036:5A1F (talk) 07:49, 8 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Bounding Into Comics is not a reputable source. They are a strongly biased right-wing publication that publishes cherry-picked numbers and rumors to support their side in what they see as a culture war. 146.115.183.91 (talk) 05:25, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
 * An example Bounding Into Comics article: “New Star Trek Comic Disgusts Readers With A Vulcan Lecturing The Crew On Gender Pronouns”. They're a Comicsgate mouthpiece, not a source for vetted information. Jere7my (talk) 19:19, 7 November 2023 (UTC)