Talk:StormCrawler

Thanks for the review. The page should be now linked from at least another page and several categories.

Could you please let me know what parts are perceived as being written like an advertisement?

I will keep improving the content but for now could we remove the planned deletion?

I just found out that notability is not related to the content of the article but its subject itself. I am perplexed as to why projects that are similar in scope and listed on and which have less followers on GitHub are considered notable enough not to be deleted. Could you please explain/comment?

Jnioche (talk) 11:40, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Jnioche, promo cut in prev. edit. Jppcap (talk) 23:53, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Multiple issues - most have been solved?
I removed the June 2016 'More citations needed', 'Advert' and the April 2017 'Primary sources' tags, as these seem to have been properly addressed since. If anyone disagrees, feel free to put them back in. I can't vouch for the notability, so I have retained that one. MichielN (talk) 10:43, 16 July 2023 (UTC)