Talk:Sumdorong Chu standoff

Neutrality
SOmebody put a neutrality tag, but did not list reasons why. This is unhelpful. I would agree the article seems written from an Indian perspective, but it would be helpful to hear Chinese objections to the current version. Basejumper 14:58, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


 * http://www.indiatodaygroup.com/itoday/18051998/cover.html
 * In 1987 Sino-Indian skirmish on 2011-05-25 05:40:06, 404 Not Found
 * In 1987 Sino-Indian skirmish on 2011-06-24 07:07:29, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:07, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


 * http://www.indiatodaygroup.com/itoday/22021999/obit.html
 * In 1987 Sino-Indian skirmish on 2011-05-25 05:40:06, 404 Not Found
 * In 1987 Sino-Indian skirmish on 2011-06-24 07:07:39, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:07, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Operation Chequerboard into Sumdorong Chu standoff
Operation Chequerboard was conducted because of and amidst the Sumdorong Chu standoff. DTM (talk) 12:14, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose - The Chequerboard page is too vague. These military operations generally are. All the newspaper men sound like Sundarji fanboys. A straight merge would damage the quality of this page. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 23:36, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Support merge on the grounds of both short text and context. I also note that policy is not to keep POVFORKs separate. Klbrain (talk) 11:02, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Given that no objection to that policy-based argument over 5 months, acting somewhat boldly, ✅ Klbrain (talk) 19:16, 20 October 2021 (UTC)