Talk:Super Chief

Informal peer review
At first glance, this does look like a good candidate for moving up through the FA process, but it's not ready yet. The timeline needs to be converted to prose and the equipment section makes the article a bit list heavy (maybe the equipment information should be split off to a subpage, keeping only the equipment from the inaugural runs here?). Slambo (Speak) 03:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Good Article Review
This article has been nominated for delisting as a Good Article. Please provide commentary and feedback on the review page. ChicagoPimp 17:50, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delisted as it was never reviewed. Merely tagged by the article creator. -- Lara Love Talk / Contribs  19:06, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Mimbreno China.jpg
Image:Mimbreno China.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


 * It seems to me that we should be able to get a free image to replace this. I'll look around at the railroadiana shows that I attend.  Slambo (Speak)  18:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


 * It's been nearly two years since Slambo's remark, and we still don't have a free image of the Mimbreno. While I have no original pieces, I do have a set of the authorized reproduction pieces that I could take a picture of at any time. Does anyone feel that this would be a worthwhile addition to the article, or do you want to keep it to the authentic originals only? Ehbowen (talk) 18:42, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

-1? -2?
Is there a citation for the use of Super Chief-1 or Super Chief-2? --plaws (talk) 02:12, 3 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I've never heard that terminology used before in any reference. I suggest we replace it with the adjectives "heavyweight" and "streamlined", respectively. Ehbowen (talk) 03:36, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Article scope
As I see it there are four somewhat distinct periods that this article could cover:


 * 1) Super Chief (ATSF): 1935-1971
 * 2) Super Chief (Amtrak): 1971-1974
 * 3) Southwest Limited (Amtrak): 1974-1984
 * 4) Southwest Chief (Amtrak): 1984-present

My sense is that this article should cover the first only, with a brief discussion of the last three. Southwest Chief needs an expanded history section but should cover all the Amtrak history. Practically speaking this would mean eventually trimming some of the history currently in the timeline section. Mackensen (talk) 20:58, 28 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Paging in light of the California Zephyr split. Mackensen (talk) 02:00, 31 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Seems reasonable to me. The 1972 operation of the Chief should be covered (about two sentences...) in #2 regardless. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:08, 31 October 2018 (UTC)